The article is of course correct, but just yesterday a NR editor took a quite different view, more in keeping with their clear and unambiguous “NeverTrump” stance:
Mark
This is an editor?
And she doesn’t know the difference between absolve and dissolve?
National Review is a stopped watch.
If there’s another fair to Trump article, by a different author, it might even be an olive branch.
How are they going to peddle conservatism while effectively working to elect Hillary? I suppose they could do it as a subsidized GOPe Pravda, but as a subscription based business they are going to be toast if Trump even has even moderate success in his first term.
Yes, I know that’s jumping past Hillary, but I have the feeling that Trump is going to have Hillary so completely branded as a sickly, lying traitor who is clinging on to political office as a life raft that she can only paddle with her woman card, the media are going to have to work hard to keep a straight face as they tell us “This race is still up for grabs.”
I think he’ll have her beat shortly after the first debate.