Well, I will go with Travis’ assessment anyway.
What ‘assessment’ is that? It is logic we’re discussing here.
Nobody says that women and children are not vulnerable to this PC idiocy.
Just because VanDeKoik ponders why the inevitable crimes against the males are not discussed, it does not follow that consideration of men is at the exclusion of women and children. All should be considered as potential victims and therefore all should be mentioned in discussion - that is the only point.
Travis asks: “Because creepy molesters lurk in the boy’s room, therefore, we should allow creepy molesters to also lurk in the girl’s room?”
That, sport, is a dumb question based on incorrect thinking. The point (which should be obvious) is that NO ‘creepy’ molesters should lurk in anyone’s bathroom.
BTW, what ‘assessment’ do you supposedly agree with that the rest of us do not?