[DoodleDawg]

Maybe, I have contempt for Courts that ignore the plain language of the Constitution and fail at their Constitutional duty.

The language is plain in Article IV as it is in Article I.

[Mechanicos]

Article one says what they are allowed to own it for. Artical 4 does not negate that, only says they are allowed to own what the Constitution says they can own. Art 4 is general not specific. Art 1 is specific. Thus Art 1 is one that limits Art 4. To say otherwise negates the plain language of Art 1 specifying what the Federal Government can own land within a state for for.