Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mechanicos
Oregon and other western states may want to get in on this as it is a USSC issue.

Oregon did take take this to SCOTUS in 1935 and lost. (See the link in post #8 above).

Article 1, section 8, cl. 17 doesn't limit what property the federal government can own within a state; it limits the places where the federal government has exclusive, rather than concurrent, jurisdiction. The Malheur Refuge was established pursuant to Article IV, section 3, clause 2, which gives Congress the power to "make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United states."

17 posted on 04/26/2016 2:40:19 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian

Since Oregon is not a territory and its boot strapping to say they own so they can own it that argument does not fly against the plain language.

Its plain language argument and its not without its chance.


22 posted on 04/26/2016 2:58:54 PM PDT by Mechanicos (Trump is for America First. Cruz is for America Last. It's that simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson