Straight out of a Marxist dictators playbook.
Agree. We don’t need another stinkin’ Harvard lawyer, freshman Senator, Marxist playbook loser, with cRuzer.
Did Ted Cruz really win every county in Maine?
http://www.politijim.com/2016/03/did-ted-cruz-really-win-every-county-in.html
The day of the caucus, the pundits polled by the Bangor paper reiterated that Trump would win and the LePage endorsement was important.
The same Bangor paper a few weeks earlier published a discussion between pundits which showed that Cruz wasn’t considered in contention at all.
[ ]
So how on March 5th, following Trump’s decisive 7 state win days before on Super Tuesday, did Cruz beat Donald 45.9% to Trump’s 32.6%? Moreover, how is it possible that following a decisive Minnesota win, that Rubio could only have attracted 8% of the vote when he had nearly doubled Cruz’s vote totals in Massachusetts days before? Between New Hampshire and Massachusetts, (as seen in the graphic to the right courtesy CNN Exit Polling), Cruz only won one single precinct or county.
You read my mind. I would just add we don’t need any more lawyers and professional politicians, and we do need term limits if they won’t limit themselves. (If we put an end to the Professional Career Political Class, we won’t need term limits, as the citizen-statesmen will need to return home to their business and lives after their term is up, as envisioned by the Founders.)