So let me see if I've got this right. You're saying it's like you're going to a prison to visit someone with a day pass. With the day pass, you are there "lawfully".
Now once inside the prison, you hide and are there long after your day pass expires. You are now there "illegally".
The problem with the argument is yes, you may be granted "lawful purpose" to enter, but once you've stayed beyond that "lawful purpose", you are here both illegally and unlawfully.
Now once inside the prison, you hide and are there long after your day pass expires. You are now there "illegally".
The problem with the argument is yes, you may be granted "lawful purpose" to enter, but once you've stayed beyond that "lawful purpose", you are here both illegally and unlawfully.
It's more pernicious than that. In Obamaland, you can tunnel under the wall into the prison, hide out for an unspecified period of time, and once discovered be declared lawful, whether or not you ever had permission to enter the prison to begin with.