Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/17/2016 2:49:58 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Has Hussein yet visited all of the 57 States of Islam?


2 posted on 04/17/2016 2:56:38 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Live Free or Die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Prime Minister, why didn’t Israel take out Iran with nukes when you had the chance?”
“Listen, mister, if we did that, everybody would hate Israel.”
“Everybody hates Israel anyway.”
“Oy, gevalt.”


3 posted on 04/17/2016 2:58:01 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
It is a formidable system to be sure, but when we come after the Iranians, we will disassemble their military piece by piece. The Iranian navy will become fresh new reefs for the lil fishes.

Behind a strong leader, Iran doesn't stand a chance against America/Israel.

I'm thinking a lil payback is in order.

4 posted on 04/17/2016 3:01:18 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Is this where some of the 150 billion dollars went that we gave Iran????


5 posted on 04/17/2016 3:01:22 PM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Two points: first, the missile shown in the Fox News article is an SA-5 Gammon, which dates from the late 60s/early 70s. Long-range missile, but virtually useless against a maneuvering target. Additionally, I haven’t seen tapered missile cannisters (like the one in the linked Tehran Times article) associated with the S-300. Most of the cannisters are perfectly cylindrical. The tapered cannister would be (most likely) associated with a surface-to-surface missile, versus a surface-to-air system.


6 posted on 04/17/2016 3:03:55 PM PDT by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Of course, no pics of the Russian crews who man & operate the SAM batteries. Same as they did in China, Vietnam, & Afghanistan, and are now doing in Ukraine & the forcibly annexed Crimean peninsula. Obama with his weakness and Putin with his thuggery have brought back the Cold War.


8 posted on 04/17/2016 3:28:09 PM PDT by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It isn’t “Iran”. It is the “ Islamic Republic of Iran”.


9 posted on 04/17/2016 3:34:12 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

““A mighty Iran militarily, politically and economically won’t mount a threat to neighbors and other Islamic countries,” Rouhani said, The Tehran Times reported. “The strength of other Islamic countries is ours and vice versa.””

This is clearly rhetoric & cryptic! Only few would get it in historical context.

I’d only add that most people forget why & how the Shah was brought down (mullahs know!) - the role of neighboring countries in it. And, it wasn’t for ‘human rights’ or ‘democracy’, though that’s been the main propaganda we’ve been fed ever since for decades.


16 posted on 04/18/2016 5:26:01 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson