Posted on 04/16/2016 2:19:42 PM PDT by Hojczyk
As a former Pentagon spokesman who’s been stationed in both Europe and Asia over a 20-year military career, I believe Donald Trump is 100 percent correct to insist that our allies share the burden of collective defense.
While Americans should be proud of our historical role to advance global freedom -- defeating Nazism and imperialism during World War II, communism during the Cold War, and battling jihadist terror networks today, we can’t be the world’s policeman forever.
We can’t afford it.
So let’s take a look at some facts & figures:
NATO is an alliance of 28 nations with a population of more than 910 million. America makes up over 1/3 the population, yet pays nearly three quarters of the defense expenditures. Each country is supposed to pay 2 percent of their GDP on defense. Yet only America, the U.K., Greece, Estonia and Poland are currently meeting their obligations.
According to World Bank figures, during 2011-2015 America spent about 3.5 percentof GDP on military expenditures. Meanwhile, our wealthy NATO allies aren’t even coming close. Italy: 1.4%; Germany: 1.2%; Canada: 1%; Spain: 0.9%. Over in Asia, Japan has spent 1.0 percent and South Korea 2.6%.
During a Washington Post editorial board with Mr. Trump last month, the newspaper noted that Japan and South Korea pay about half of the non-personnel costs of U.S. military basing. And his response: “Why isn’t it 100 percent?”
Great question.
Even getting past the massive trade deficits with allies like Japan, we’re funding a system that makes our allies nicer places to live than here.
Take airports, for instance. Many of our NATO allies, Japan and South Korea put ours to shame. The first time I set foot in Japan, it was mind-blowing.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
J.D. Gordon is a retired Navy Commander who served as a Pentagon spokesman in the Office of the Secretary of Defense from 2005-09. He serves as senior adviser to several Washington-based think tanks.
Nope, we’re $19 trillion in debt and our own national infrastructure is crumbling. Literally.
Anybody remember the I-35W Bridge in Minneapolis? On a bright, sunny August day in 2007, it collapsed into the Mississippi River during rush hour, killing 13 and injuring 145.
Anybody seen current pictures of once mighty and prosperous industrial cities like Detroit; Gary, Indiana; or Akron, Ohio?
Or urban decay in places like Philadelphia, Baltimore, Chicago, Milwaukee, Oakland, Los Angeles and Ferguson?
Isn’t it time to do some nation-building at home?
Meanwhile, aside from natural disasters, our top allies don’t worry about physically crumbling cities. And that’s thanks to the American taxpayer underwriting their massive security bills since the 1940s.
So let’s take a look at some facts & figures:
NATO is an alliance of 28 nations with a population of more than 910 million. America makes up over 1/3 the population, yet pays nearly three quarters of the defense expenditures. Each country is supposed to pay 2 percent of their GDP on defense. Yet only America, the U.K., Greece, Estonia and Poland are currently meeting their obligations.
According to World Bank figures, during 2011-2015 America spent about 3.5 percentof GDP on military expenditures. Meanwhile, our wealthy NATO allies aren’t even coming close. Italy: 1.4%; Germany: 1.2%; Canada: 1%; Spain: 0.9%. Over in Asia, Japan has spent 1.0 percent and South Korea 2.6%.
During a Washington Post editorial board with Mr. Trump last month, the newspaper noted that Japan and South Korea pay about half of the non-personnel costs of U.S. military basing. And his response: “Why isn’t it 100 percent?”
Great question.
Even getting past the massive trade deficits with allies like Japan, we’re funding a system that makes our allies nicer places to live than here.
Take airports, for instance. Many of our NATO allies, Japan and South Korea put ours to shame. The first time I set foot in Japan, it was mind-blowing. Kansai Airport is a marvel of technology, entirely built on an artificial island in the middle of Osaka Bay. Never seen anything like it. Two decades later, the state-of-the-art, luxurious air hub still beats JFK, O’Hare and LAX.
And then there’s high-speed rail, subways, highways and ferries. They’re modernizing while we’re struggling to keep ours on-line. Case in point, Washington, DC Metro authorities have been discussing potential 6-month closures of certain rail lines for repairs — which comes after several accident and fire related fatalities in recent years.
But beyond the lopsided financial burden, our allies aren’t pulling their weight on the battlefield either.
As Defense Secretary Robert Gates noted on his way out of the Pentagon in 2011, only a handful of allies were willing to fight and die in Afghanistan. Some insisted their troops couldn’t fight in the snow or mountains. On NATO, he said its future is “dim, if not dismal.” A running joke during my Pentagon days was that “International Security Assistance Force” (ISAF) in Afghanistan, actually stood for “I Saw Americans Fighting.”
In the Middle East, it’s even worse. While we spend billions to defend Saudi Arabia and other Gulf State allies, we get practically nothing. Though they’ve signed up to fight ISIS, the vast majority of airstrikes are American. The Saudis ought to pay the bills, especially considering the role their hardline clerics play in creating jihadist networks in the first place. Let’s recall that 15 of 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudis. The Iranians are even more hostile, yet don’t claim to be an ally.
While America shoulders the free world’s defense burden, we must recognize the threats have changed. That’s despite the panicking establishment’s insistence they haven’t, both on the left and the right.
While the Soviet Union was the biggest threat during the Cold War, it no longer exists. Today’s greatest long-term threats to Europe and America are radical Islam-inspired terrorism and unchecked immigration, which by the way, go hand in hand.
Next is nuclear proliferation and rogue nations like Iran and North Korea. Then the rise of China, busily hacking and cheating its way to superpower status. They don’t have to conquer us if we internally collapse.
Bottom line, our allies must get serious about defense. If they can’t pull their own weight, why should we go broke carrying them on our backs?
Time for a fresh approach.
You damn right The Donald is correct.
If the Euro’s want to shoot themselves in the foot and allow the enemy through the gate, I’m not going to pay for it.
Make America great again!!!!
Good commentary. Agree 100%.
This is an issue that JUST MIGHT come to a head in November. Throw in South Korea. What did we get for Iraq besides doing Iran’s dirty work.
NATO is another example of a paper tiger. When a actual crisis in the form of mass migration occurs, they cannot even deal with that. There are many other mirages out there.
I didn’t see the point of continuing NATO after the fall of the Soviet Union. A regional alliance led by the UK, Germany, and Poland would have been enough to deter a weak Russia.
I was saying this even before the fall of the Soviet Union. Yes, we needed to have troops over in Europe back then, but we also needed to start making the euros pay their fair share of the burden after they had recovered from the worst of the war damage.
Instead, we spoiled them rotten, and made them think they didn’t have to do much of anything, because they could rely on us. Aside from the Poles and a few others, they barely did anything to help.
The U.S. should withdraw from NATO. NATO lost all credibility when it intervened in Serbia on behalf of Kosovar muslim terrorists. It cemented that loss of credibility when it bombed Libya into rubble.
I think you are wrong.
IT was created for a threat.
In the meanwhile that threat has changed to a more immediate threat now backed and supported by the OIC driven “UN”.
I thought there was a legal limit on the amount Japan could spend on national defense, as agreed in the 1945 surrender.
But, but, but, but, but!!! Think of how grateful the Euros were for all the treasure we spent on protecting them over the years!!!!
/sarc
NATO lost credibility when they let in the Turks, and didn’t expel them when they invaded Cyprus in 1974.
There you go.
Thanks, I wasn’t aware of that history. Clearly NATO has become
nothing more than a tool for western leaders who don’t have
the political capital to use their own nation’s military forces
to do the dirty work they want done.
Bump.
“Each country is supposed to pay 2 percent of their GDP on defense.” Is that a NATO requirement?
It does sound like NATO members should be encouraged to better support NATO.
I’m more worried about all the money and legitimacy we give to the United Nations.
Has he said anything about SETO?
I have long thought that with us bearing so much of the burden for Europe’s defense that we have enabled them to have their tax and spend socialist societies - with all the benefits to the people paid by the “government” that was free of the normal function and cost of a government - the defense of the citizens. And this in turn has created the dependence on the powers that be that are now betraying the people with the “refugees”. What I see is so many of the dependents really aren’t prepared for this - they don’t know how to react.
Did we do them any favors?
If you're referring to SEATO (Southeast Asia Treaty Organization), it was dissolved in 1977.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.