Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
No. Next question.

Because the U.S. without allies is stronger than the U.S. with allies?

7 posted on 04/14/2016 5:29:27 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lower Deck
Because the U.S. without allies is stronger than the U.S. with allies?

As currently constructed the US doesn't have allies...we are infected with parasites. NATO is completely one sided. The Europeans scoff at us, criticize us and blame us for everything wrong in the world, all the while demanding that we defend them at any cost should the need arise. Screw that!

13 posted on 04/14/2016 5:39:01 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck

The US will be stronger with allies who actually blow the dust off their checkbooks once or twice a century.

L


14 posted on 04/14/2016 5:47:19 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck
Because the U.S. without allies is stronger than the U.S. with allies?

There is a difference between one-sided obligations and allies. Most of the Euro-weenies are obligations and burdens. Britain is an ally.
15 posted on 04/14/2016 5:48:36 AM PDT by baltimorepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck

Becayse the US without foreign entanglements is better off that the US with foreign entanglements.
Besides, we spend more on defense than the next 10 countries combined. Just what does the rest of Europe bring to table? Bases in a war we don’t want to fight?


16 posted on 04/14/2016 5:55:10 AM PDT by Little Ray (NOTHING THAT SOMEONE ELSE HAS TO PAY FOR IS A RIGHT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck
Because the US without allies is stronger than the US without allies?

Since the allies have welcomed with open arms invaders and have refused to defend themselves, yes. Besides that, a US without allies that defends itself from invasion would be stronger than we are now.

We've never answered what should've been the first problem that needed to be solved....why were all of those Saudis involved with 911 were in the US illegally, and what were we going to do to keep the US safe from within.

Face it. Globalism is a disaster.

19 posted on 04/14/2016 6:12:49 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck
"...Russia will always have to be watched....Germany will always have to be integrated into some sort of military alliance....the United States will always have a natural self-interest in preemptively keeping kindred Europeans from killing each other."

Great synopsis.
It does, though, need the adult to enforce the NATO rules - 2% GDP military expenditures and no autocracies allowed (Turkey).

29 posted on 04/14/2016 6:33:39 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck

If they were truly our allies they’d at least make an attempt to carry their own weight.

Every dollar we spend protecting them is another dollar they spend on welfare.

Why are we subsidizing the world’s welfare programs?


32 posted on 04/14/2016 6:47:35 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Lower Deck

“Because the U.S. without allies is stronger than the U.S. with allies? “

Yes, because we pay for those allies to belong to NATO. NATO is the US and whenever we need their support we get lukewarm responses.


34 posted on 04/14/2016 7:00:04 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson