Of course I’m honest. I have no problem with states determining how their delegates are selected.
You have no problem with Trump getting more delegates than votes in primary states?
Is that ethically, rationally and morally defendable??
Be honest.
I’m being sarcastic here; I don’t question your honesty. The coherency and consistency of your argument, yes; but not your honesty.
What State did get more Delegates than VOTES in a Primary STATE. The most he got was 99 Delegates in Florida from 1 Million Voters. 1 Million is more than 99
The winner by the people voting of the States should get more delegates then the losers. Trump has won almost twice as many States by voting as Cruz. There is nothing to your meme of Trump having more delegate - he earned them honestly, Cruz has won nothing honestly since the GOPe took over Cruz’s dead campaign after the South.
OK.
My question is: were Colorado voters aware back in August that there would be no voting by the population? Did the Establishment announce the change openly or did they keep it a secret? If the GOPe didn't broadcast the change so it was known to everyone - voters and candidates alike - then it's not "validly changing the rules". It's cheating.
What did the voters know, and when did they know it?