More lies from the National Review. Who reads that rag?
Look, Trump is saying "there was no vote". Maybe that explains why his supporters didn't show up to the votes that were indeed held on March 1. If he didn't know there was a vote, why should they?
Show me the lie.
“More lies from the National Revew. Who reads that rag?”
*********************************************************************
To a certain breed of Trumpster, the TRUTH = LIES ...IF that truth conflicts with the MYTHOLOGY put out by Donald Trump.
I feel sorrow & pity for that breed of Trumpster. I hope that most of that breed will recover their senses with time but fear that many are hopelessly permanently lost in that unreality.
We need an in house FR ad blocker for serial spammers like Reaganaut.
Could you please point out the lies?
Just because the truth is not something you want to hear, doesn't negate the fact that it's the truth.
Do you really think you can right off the message as a lie just because you dislike the messenger?
Maybe they are the same ppl who post these nonsense trolling threads every day and night at FR...!
Tonight for the first time in weeks, it looks like someone else is on-duty and taking the lead in putting up one anti-Trump thread after another.
I’m not sure sometimes if their agenda is to just get attention and disrupt FR by being annoying, or if they actually believe they’re “making a difference” & “affecting the outcome” of stuff. Srsly.