Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Clinton Never Jeopardized National Security in Email Case
Newsmax ^ | April 7,2016

Posted on 04/10/2016 8:13:09 AM PDT by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: Da Coyote

Obama is a turd but the kind that never dries out and stops smelling. He’s like a jellyfish turd, if all that crap collected in one abyss in the ocean, with Russian toxic waste thrown in.


41 posted on 04/10/2016 8:36:20 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Posted this back in '09:
If she had the goods on him she’d be president.NO DOUBT

I can imagine the meeting.

Hillary produces proof 0bama was born in Kenya.

Obama shows Hillary proof of a fraction of her felonies.

--------------------------------------------------------

What's the worst that could have happened to 0bama?

He declares that he was always told he was born in Hawaii, and had never been informed of the true circumstances of his birth, apologizes, and then he gracefully steps down and goes back to being a senator.

What's the worst that could happen to Hillary!™?

If 1/10th of the rumors are true, She'd be facing being stripped of all her congressional perks, serious jail time and perhaps even the death penalty.

In this show-down, guess who blinks...


42 posted on 04/10/2016 8:37:05 AM PDT by null and void ("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
This is somebody who has served her country...

It's a cookbook!

43 posted on 04/10/2016 8:37:40 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The corrupt waste of flesh acts as though Hillary accidentally let a couple of messages wind up on her private server, instead of meticulously routing thousands of them there over her entire time as Sec. of State.No doubt the most incriminating were among the 35,000 she destroyed. Destroying government property is a felony. She should be in jail instead of running for president, but Obama is so sure of his ability to deceive our bumpkin nation that he dishes out this BS. Shame on Fox for allowing their resident weasel Lefty Wallace to aid and abet this scam.


44 posted on 04/10/2016 8:37:47 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

This is called a false straw man. The legal criteria is not “jeopardizing national security”. The legal requirement is to protect classified information.

I smell a pardon from obama in exchange for some political favors.


45 posted on 04/10/2016 8:38:36 AM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

No way I’m standing in a line that long.


46 posted on 04/10/2016 8:39:05 AM PDT by null and void ("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

47 posted on 04/10/2016 8:39:15 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Mutually assured destruction. They got each other’s backs but senile Bill not playing by the truce.


48 posted on 04/10/2016 8:39:50 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Look for Bill to begin to stop breathing soon.


49 posted on 04/10/2016 8:42:41 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Judging by the unbroken consistency and depth of his lying, she must have crapped all over National Security issues. The assertion is absurd on its face.


50 posted on 04/10/2016 8:46:58 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Using home email allows anyone to hack into those emails, many of which contained top secret information. That does indeed jeopardize national security.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/quist2/chap_7.html

“National Security Information (hereinafter “classified information”) shall be classified at one of the following three levels:(1) “Top Secret” shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.”


51 posted on 04/10/2016 8:47:13 AM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Bill Clinton looks terrible. He’s got some health issues going on.


52 posted on 04/10/2016 8:49:39 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Obama: "Clinton Never Jeopardized National Security in Email Case"

"That was ValJar's job and mine "

53 posted on 04/10/2016 8:50:03 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

One thing about the truth—it can be squashed, torn, shredded, censored, tied, ignored, lied about, hidden, trashed and scorned. But it can never be destroyed forever. It will rise up no matter what enemies can do to it. Truth will prevail one way or another.


54 posted on 04/10/2016 8:50:59 AM PDT by tflabo (truth or tyrrany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Is this incompetent, anti-American loser on crack 24/7???


55 posted on 04/10/2016 8:54:32 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

There is no realistic possibility that foreign government officials received email from Hillary@Clintonmail.com and didn’t notice that it was a commercial server. There is no realistic possibility that they let that pass without hacking her email. Given that the top secret information she knowingly sent on that server was classified that highly because its release “would cause exceptionally grave damage to the security of the United States”, it is certain not only that Hillary jeopardized national security but also that her reckless efforts to dodge disclosure laws directly harmed our security.

Obama lied. Again. As he has with every statement in his malignant life except his threat to “fundamentally transform” what used to be a free and prosperous country.


56 posted on 04/10/2016 8:55:19 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton
Look for Bill to begin to stop breathing soon.

Mid October, so the widder clinton can get the sympathy vote.

Do I need to add: no autopsy and prompt cremation?

57 posted on 04/10/2016 8:55:51 AM PDT by null and void ("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

So the Obama position is that classified material on an unsecured server is not jeopardized unless it is actually stolen? Which means, as a practical matter, unless prosecutors can prove it was stolen. Which means, as a practical matter, that Hillary is safe unless someone who stole the classified material chooses to burn her. Which means, as a practical matter, that Hillary is safe as long as she accedes to blackmail demands. On the Obama theory of the case, at least.


58 posted on 04/10/2016 8:57:34 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Obama: Clinton Never Jeopardized National Security in Email Case

...

Considering how much he hates America, a person has to wonder what he would consider a threat to national security.


59 posted on 04/10/2016 9:01:11 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The article does not show a quote from the President saying what the article headline says.


60 posted on 04/10/2016 9:03:16 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson