Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama says Clinton never jeopardized national security in email case: Fox
Reuters via Yahoo News ^ | April 10, 2016 | Reuters

Posted on 04/10/2016 7:00:24 AM PDT by John W

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: joshua c

from the same guy who claimed if you like your health plan you can keep your health plan...


41 posted on 04/10/2016 7:41:05 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John W
Typical liberal BS. 0b0z0, as usual, is applying smoke & mirrors.

The law says that those responsible for National Security info must protect it. Failure to do so is a crime.

Deliberately exposing it to compromise is a greater crime.

There may be enhanced penalties if the information is actually accessed by FORNs -- but the first two acts are serious felonies -- in and of themselves.

~~~~~~~~~~

I guarantee that neither Hildacankles nor 0b0z0 could pass the background investigation for a Top Secret security clearance.

Without such a clearance, even attending a single National Security Briefing is a felony.

They are both felons!

42 posted on 04/10/2016 7:42:39 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah: Satan's current alias. "Obama": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Is Freebie suffering from early signs of senility?

Now he says The Screech’s emails didn’t endanger national security. He has previously claimed the opposite.

Now he says The Screech is qualified to be president. He previously claimed the opposite.

Freebie seems to be all over the map. Perhaps it depends on which DNC daily talkingpoints memos he reads.

==

I have noticed that the soft, slow, grandmotherly voice The Screen was using for a couple of weeks didn’t last. She has tried that stunt before, but after a few days of it, she relapses into the screeching, ear-piercing, ranting voice she is known for.


43 posted on 04/10/2016 7:43:02 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Obama said. "This is somebody who has served her country for four years as secretary of state, and did an outstanding job."

Then name her accomplishments while SoS. So far, she hasn't been able to do that.

44 posted on 04/10/2016 7:44:56 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Yep.

You’re right.

There is no quote of Obama actually saying this in the article.


45 posted on 04/10/2016 7:46:06 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: John W; flaglady47; pax_et_bonum; Bob Ireland; Maine Mariner
I know that in many states there are "undue influence" laws pertaining to those in command over subordinates. Also in the military when pertaining to courts martial.

I'm not a lawyer, perhaps some freeper legal-eagle could help us out here as it could apply to any U.S. president/commander-in-chief.

Leni

46 posted on 04/10/2016 7:51:16 AM PDT by MinuteGal (GO TRUMP GO !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Could we have some type of Nixon Saturday Night Massacre in reverse? Obama fores people at DOJ until he finds someone willing to not indict her?


Don’t we wish..by the way, I miss Nixon.


47 posted on 04/10/2016 7:52:25 AM PDT by AFret.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: John W
WGAF what Obama has to say about anything?
48 posted on 04/10/2016 8:14:51 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Let us now try liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

And even though Lois Lerner resigned, there is not a shred of evidence that she should have resigned. Blah. Blah.


49 posted on 04/10/2016 8:17:56 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

How does he know??


50 posted on 04/10/2016 8:30:43 AM PDT by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Jim Hoft is an in the bag Trump shill. Even if Cruz gets mathematically eliminated on April 26, there is a good chance Trump won’t get to 1237 either. Anyone’s game after first convention ballot.


51 posted on 04/10/2016 8:35:31 AM PDT by socal_parrot (I hate to say I told you so, but...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: socal_parrot

Think this may belong on a different thread.


52 posted on 04/10/2016 8:41:15 AM PDT by John W (Under One Year And Counting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: John W

Words you can trust from a guy who ahs a dead mans SS number.


53 posted on 04/10/2016 8:57:51 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

These criminals and traitors make me ill.


54 posted on 04/10/2016 9:06:03 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: John W

He does not know this.


55 posted on 04/10/2016 9:30:49 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77
Hillary served herself lots of money from other countries to do favors for them as SOS. No one believes a word Obama says about anything. Wallace should have asked him to name one accomplishment he and Hillary accomplished.
56 posted on 04/10/2016 9:54:03 AM PDT by dandiegirl (BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Obozo is the process of tying his legacy irretrievably to the Clinton crime family. It always looked like Obozo was out to lunch most of the time. This isn’t surprising.


57 posted on 04/10/2016 9:58:54 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Not a smidgen of corruption with Lerner. I guess she just took the fifth for fun.


58 posted on 04/10/2016 10:00:06 AM PDT by dandiegirl (BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

We know that Hillary is an accomplished liar. But, unfortunately, there is a sizable community of people who seem to not care that she is basically hollow and/or are stuck in their ideological muck and will vote for her regardless of her lack of any leadership/executive capabilities.


59 posted on 04/10/2016 10:01:39 AM PDT by Purdue77 (I just don't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77
He has to pretend she did a great job as Secretary of State, otherwise he looks bad for picking her. Just wait until he finds out that four Americans, including the US ambassador to Libya, got killed in Benghazi. (He'd know already except that he doesn't watch Fox News and the other channels didn't consider it newsworthy.)

The highlight of Hillary's service in the Senate was getting three post offices renamed. At least I think it was three.

60 posted on 04/10/2016 10:52:44 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson