Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Judiciary Chairman: We Won't Consider Obama Supreme Court Nominee
CNS News ^ | 4/8/16 | Melanie Hunter

Posted on 04/08/2016 4:24:31 PM PDT by Nachum

(CNSNews.com) – Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said on the Senate floor Thursday that he will not bow to pressure from Democrats to consider President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court pick, D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Merrick Garland.

Grassley argued that the American people should decide the direction of the high court when they vote for the next president.

“It is no secret that the White House strategy is to put pressure on this chairman of the Judiciary Committee and other Republicans in the hopes that we can be worn down and ultimately agree to hold hearings on the nominee,” said Grassley.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chairman; scotus
What part of NO don't you understand?
1 posted on 04/08/2016 4:24:32 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 04/08/2016 4:24:53 PM PDT by Nachum (ISIS is alive... and Chris Stevens is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Last time was about 1888. He’s just being a smart a$$ again as usual.


3 posted on 04/08/2016 4:39:44 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Chuck Gressley, Antonin Scalia, hmmmm ....what do they have in common?


4 posted on 04/08/2016 4:41:01 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I sincerely hope Senator Grassley sticks to his word.


5 posted on 04/08/2016 4:43:47 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

+1 GOP.


6 posted on 04/08/2016 4:43:58 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Cave in 3, 2, ...


7 posted on 04/08/2016 4:58:58 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Grassley is a tough old bird...I hope they don’t have anything on him.....


8 posted on 04/08/2016 5:17:27 PM PDT by Stayfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

I do not trust him. Former Iowan that notes Grassley keeps his head down and avoids conflict. His lauded defense of whistleblowers has rarely produced positive results.


9 posted on 04/08/2016 6:57:05 PM PDT by whistleduck ("....the calm confidence of a Christian with 4 aces".....S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stayfree

I do not trust him. Former Iowan that notes Grassley keeps his head down and avoids conflict. His lauded defense of whistleblowers has rarely produced positive results.

Grassley and commie tommy Harkin got the ethanol scam rolling across the great plains to the detriment of the country.


10 posted on 04/08/2016 6:58:46 PM PDT by whistleduck ("....the calm confidence of a Christian with 4 aces".....S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

first time the pubbies will stand up to this stain, obammy?
Nahhh.
No confidence the pubbies will do anything cept maybe shed cruz and Trump from their election.


11 posted on 04/09/2016 3:12:45 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (500 years ago we had Shakesphere, obammys people live in mud huts still. Go figure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
What part of NO don't you understand?

If it remains "no", then it will be the first time he has heard it when it actually meant "no".

He did tremendous damage but he couldn't have managed it all without the consent of the Repubs who refused to take a stand against him because they want to remain as ensconced as the Dems. That's why all them that originally called Cruz too radical are now working with him to stop Trump - they can discard Cruz's carcass after the goal is achieved.

12 posted on 04/09/2016 3:42:38 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson