Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Unfortunately, price controls, in whatever form, will be necessary for medicines. While the drug companies may be entitled to $50.00 per pill they are NOT entitled to $750.00 per pill.


3 posted on 04/07/2016 7:04:56 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

they pushed gabapentin for a million off label uses, even though most docs say it’s basically a placebo.

I have read a lot about its mechanism as compared to benzos and the benzos win out every time, regarding anxiety.

As for pain, though I think it was WAY overprescribed, oxy is miles ahead of gabapentin in controlling pain. BTW, big pharma PROMISED they would never push oxy for anything other than cancer.

But we knew that was a lie.

Now that millions are addicted, they come out with suboxone to treat the addictions. Can’t lose that way!!

The only thing that helps my head injury symptoms is klonopin.

Gabapentin, lyrica, and a billion other pills that wer supposed to help did nothing.


4 posted on 04/07/2016 7:09:33 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

What does the amount that the pill is being sold for have to do with the right of ownership?

CC


6 posted on 04/07/2016 7:10:24 AM PDT by Captain Compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

What does the amount that the pill is being sold for have to do with the right of ownership?

CC


7 posted on 04/07/2016 7:10:39 AM PDT by Captain Compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

Why do you believe that the pharmaceutical companies should not be able to set their own prices? I also note that you use the loaded term “entitled”, as opposed to the more frank term “deserve”, which is what you mean.


10 posted on 04/07/2016 7:12:32 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
The private enterprise argument is irrelevant here because there is no effective price competition in Obama managed health care.

Three conditions for a free market long known by economists:


12 posted on 04/07/2016 7:14:54 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

Without that $750, they won’t have the incentive (or money) for another $2,000,000,000 in R&D for the next drug.
Hard to quibble about the price of a lifesaving drug that DOESN’T EXIST BECAUSE YOU DISCOURAGED ITS CREATION.


13 posted on 04/07/2016 7:15:10 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Unfortunately, price controls, in whatever form, will be necessary for medicines. While the drug companies may be entitled to $50.00 per pill they are NOT entitled to $750.00 per pill.

To which I must rhetorically retort, "What medicine?" If it costs 100's of millions in R&D to create a drug, but companies cannot recoup that cost plus make a profit, there will be no new drugs available for the consumer to buy. Someday your child or grandchild might develop a nasty MRSA infection, which few drugs are effective against. We desperately need new antibiotics to fight this and other resistant bacteria, but since there is little profit in this class of drug, we are seeing little research and precious few new drugs in this class come to market. With price controls, that situation will spread across all classes of drugs.

22 posted on 04/07/2016 7:24:43 AM PDT by Sparticus (Tar and feathers for the next dumb@ss Republican that uses the word bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

“While the drug companies may be entitled to $50.00 per pill they are NOT entitled to $750.00 per pill.”

How very fascist. What’s next? Want to tell me what wage I’m “entitled” to?

L


30 posted on 04/07/2016 7:51:26 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

You have an odd idea of property rights.


33 posted on 04/07/2016 8:03:24 AM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson