[Thank You Rush]

“”In the ruling, the judge cited the possibility of Clinton and her staff acting “in bad faith” with a constantly shifting narrative of what took place and why.””

I would say the title “set up in bad faith” is not consistent with the above statement. “Set up” is definitely before the fact and the “narrative” after the fact IMO.

The beast is great at “I don’t recall” responses so all that’s needed is for her to give some tutoring sessions to her former employees - no problem!

We can get Paul Shanklin back on the job to remind everyone how she does it if we have to.

[scooby321]

She is National Review’s Candidate

[GOPJ]

I would say the title “set up in bad faith” is not consistent with the above statement. “Set up” is definitely before the fact and the “narrative” after the fact IMO.

Selling access and inside 'information' is what the Clinton's do... it's why the 'set up' happened...

[GOPJ]

The Clintons don't build buildings, they don't make a product, there's never been a 'paycheck' either worked for that would cover their lifestyle... NOPE, they SELL access and they sell secret information that can't be bought on the free markets...