Posted on 03/29/2016 9:20:30 AM PDT by detective
Sounds like you have had some experience in cheating.
<><><><><
I wasnt the best human being before getting married, but since the words I Do came out of my mouth nearly 27 years ago, for the first and only time, no experience with cheating on my spouse whatsoever. Sorry, apparently you are hearing things again. First I sounded naive, now I sound like a cheater. Have your hearing checked.
You have way more personal experience with cheating that I do (cuz I have none).
Well, that’s great that you have kept your marriage vows, but, many, many do not. If you think this is something to look away from -it isn’t. It hurts families very much. And, if true about Cruz, then I feel for his wife and kids. Having said that, I will never vote for him - and not because of the alleged affairs. He is a liar, fake and phony.
After all Bill swore he did not have sex with Monica Lewinski
<><><><
I see that we agree that Bill is liar.
But of course what he told to Sally Perdue is the God’s honest truth.
“I see that we agree that Bill is liar.”
So are you saying that Hillary is not a liar? And that Hilary is not a lesbian? And that Hillary did not have abortions?
I confess to being surprised, as the former wife of a serial adulterer, recognizing how hurtful that is to families, that you are all in the for the admitted serial adulterer.
All adulterers are liars, fakes and phonies.
The difference is that Trump admitted to his infidelities, and never blamed anyone but himself. Cruz blames everyone else for his deeds, and also, Trump wasn’t a presidential candidate which would be a matter of national security. There is a difference. I’m sure this hurt Trump’s family, but those kids have all turned out very, very well. And, in case, you aren’t aware, Trump’s current wife and past 2 get together for lunch on occasion. None of them hate him.
This is very typical behavior of the “Lipstick Lesbians”
They have one child, a “See, the plumbing works” child to prove to the world (and themselves) that they are a “real woman.”
BTW, regarding Lipstick Lesbians, the Hildabeast is really about 3/4 of the way between a Lipstick Lesbian and a BBB, “the Baddest Bitch on the Block.”
PS, question of the night, “Why was Bill once like the Little Dutch Boy”
(No, don’t answer it.)
“question of the night, “Why was Bill once like the Little Dutch Boy””
Supposedly Bill and Hillary had a sham marriage. There was no physical contact.
It scares me to think about what I will say when I come face look at abortion to face with God. I can’t even imagine being a woman who had abortions. I believe anyone is redeemable but it’s scary how many people think of abortion as a sacrament.
“I see that we agree that Bill is liar.”
So are you saying that Hillary is not a liar? And that Hilary is not a lesbian? And that Hillary did not have abortions?
<><><
Don’t be daft.
How would I know if HRC is lesbian, and why would I care?
How would I know if HRC has had abortions, and why would I care?
She obviously supports the right to have them and that says everything on the topic that needs to be said, don’t you think?
As for being a liar, of course, the word politician is derived from the Sanskrit for liar.
How would I know if HRC is lesbian, and why would I care?
You refused to answer the question of Hillary being a liar.
You admit that are completely ignorant of the other two questions and say you don’t care that you are ignorant.
That sums it up.
There is nothing more to say.
Try to learn something about a topic before you post ignorant comments.
Maybe read the whole post before you claim that something was or was not said. You failed to read the last sentence, in which your question was answered.
But that’s OK, you’re really busy thinking about who HRC is having sex with.
“You failed to read the last sentence, in which your question was answered.”
I read the last sentence. It said nothing about Hillary Clinton. It did not even mention her. It talked about the meaning of words in Sanskrit.
You must learn to write more clearly and concisely.
You must learn to write more clearly and concisely
<><><><
When the only subject of a post is HRC, as was the case here, most English speakers would instantly recognize that the subject of the sentence refers to HRC.
It was not a clarity issue, only a reading comprehension problem.
Was that clear and concise enough?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.