The article does contain several valid points ...
The article does contain several valid points ...
Here is the typical NYT low info writer cheap shot—
“Evidently, in Trumplandia, being scantily clad means you’re no longer qualified to be a journalist, but being naked means you’re perfectly qualified to be first lady.”
It is useful as a pulse on how desperate the left is nowadays to drag down trump and cruz (and try to build up the has-been fiorina).
hoping this saves folks some time.
It has always been so and will always be so. Men are the movers. Women are the passengers, with individual exceptions here and there, think Margaret Thatcher. This will change only if and when he academics and grant scientists succeed in making males unnecessary for procreation and then men take themselves out of business. There re signs that in the feminized world of Western Civilization this is beginning to happen. But it will still be a man’s world with a different and less female friendly set of men running it. The West has feminized itself past the point of no return. Two major societies are and will remain wholly masculine. One of them will rule the future or they will take turns as they push against each other across the ruins of the West.
The eyes have it, they are the mirrors to the soul. Not liking cruz’s wifes they look a wierd
If Trump wins at least we’ll finally have an attractive First Lady. Better Melania than Bill.
From the title I was worried Hillary is changing her strategy after losing 3 states to Bernie yesterday. I’ll promise to stop criticizing Hillary’s outfits if she promises to leave them on.
“They can either be beauties or beasts or “the love of my life.” They can be “crazy” or “losers,” “fat pigs” or “dogs.” They can be mothers and daughters.”
That’s just a fact of life.
“whether they are assets or liabilities, they are objects”
Once again, that’s just a fact of life.
“They have been flattened into human baseball cards, to be rated and traded, compared and assessed, and their worth depends not on who they are or what they do, but on how good they look and how much their husbands love them.”
The media does that all on it’s own, especially in advertising.
This article is stupid in it’s attempt to say women are treated
this way only in elections. They are treated that way all the
time. That’s just the way it is.
Is this the same Jennifer Weiner that wrote “Good in Bed”?
Dear Jennifer:
Women can also be obtuse and repetitive.
Like you.
