Posted on 03/25/2016 9:57:43 AM PDT by detective
Watchdog group Judicial Watch has uncovered new Hillary Clinton emails that demonstrate she was using her illicit homebrew email server at least a month earlier than she has previously admitted, and also make it clear she has not handed over all of her official correspondence yet, despite claims to the contrary.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
She should have been in prison 40 felonies ago.
Nah, the email to her personal aide concerning the status of a secure phone from the NSA can easily be explained as one of the “personal” emails that she deleted.
I have been trying and trying to find a way to believe that Hillary was just stupid about handling secret information.
I give up.
She’s a filthy, rotten traitor to her country.
There is no other reason for her behavior with that Blackberry device.
She sold us, our kids and grandkids out for money.
Anybody who defends her actions is also a traitor to this country.
Hillary is a Judas, selling us out for silver.
...and quite a lot of gold.
" Where are all those electronics, Hillary"?
Did Hillary delete pertinent e-mails while subject to congressional investigation?
THE NYT REPORTED 3/27/15: Clintons review (and erasing?) of her emails did not occur when she was secretary of state ......or even shortly after she left office.
Last October, nearly two years after she left office, the State Department sent her a letter requesting all government records, like emails, she may have possessed. In response, she provided the State Department in December with about 30,000 printed emails that she said were government records. She has said that an additional 30,000 emails were personal.
It appears Clinton still has copies of the emails she deemed public records. Attached to Mr. Kendalls letter was one sent to him by the State Department this week.
A letter from the under secretary of state for management, Patrick F. Kennedy, said that the department understood that she wanted to keep copies of those documents. Mr. Kennedy said that the agency had consulted with the National Archives, and that allowing her access to the documents is in the public interest as it will promote informed discussion as she responds to congressional and other inquiries.
========================================
ADDENDUM---The State Dept may also be facing charges of misleading a court WRT the court's request for documents...and for tampering w/ evidence.
And the NYTimes and Washington Post don’t care.
But the GPOe doesn’t care either ..............
So, can we draw a logical conclusion from these new revelations that Hillary (and/ or others) will be indicted?
Just get it out there.
Got it, thank you.
Justice is on life support. How sad.
Apply the Scooter Libby standard to the case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.