Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbrfl

So, let’s see...Utah’s Absentee voting rules indicate that the completed Absentee ballots must be post-marked the DAY BEFORE the election, in this case March 21st. So, any ballot post-marked on the day of the primary, March 22nd, would not be counted. Therefore, the voting that occurred through March 22nd were legitimate. Thus, the reported results are accurate!

Where is the scandal?


19 posted on 03/24/2016 7:47:04 AM PDT by HoosierWordsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HoosierWordsmith

> “So, let’s see...Utah’s Absentee voting rules indicate that the completed Absentee ballots must be post-marked the DAY BEFORE the election ...”

Uh-huh, Reference?

How about 7 days for in-person or online before, and 30 days before if by postal mail?

And how about the Cruz campaign instructions for voters to hand registration forms with a COPY of govt issued ID to precinct captains or other officials. Does that smack you as an invitation to fraud?


24 posted on 03/24/2016 7:57:32 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: HoosierWordsmith
Those people who were told they could still vote absentee intended to vote. If they weren't told that, they've would've gone to caucus and their votes would've counted.

Do you seriously not follow that?

26 posted on 03/24/2016 7:59:27 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson