Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bert; TexasFreeper2009

I agree w/Tex’s post above.

This can NOT BE a misdemeanor. And the second layer of charges (Ohio) needs to be held in place also. NO concurrent sentences. ALL time MUST be served. This cannot be permitted.

The Ohio jurist, who allowed bail (which by the way was set at what amount?!?) needs questioned as to his/her leniency. Why was he let go immediately?

This was dismissed too quickly and swept under the rug (because it’s Trump??? Because if that’s the case anarachy reigns.)

Jail time in a Federal facility. No early parole. Full sentence.


15 posted on 03/17/2016 5:11:24 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: PennsylvaniaMom

I would argue off the cuff that there was no jurist involved but rather a political hack with an anti Republican agenda

Further, by choosing a charge that was very insignificant, the Federal DA was patron for the crowd of disruptors. The federalization was the path down the way to insignificance of the event

There was an assault but no assault charge by order from way above


19 posted on 03/17/2016 5:18:43 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson