Posted on 03/12/2016 8:56:37 AM PST by Treeless Branch
“We must fight fire with fire.”
A very bad idea.
So you’re saying we should resist violence until it’s time to start shooting.
Why should we let it get to that point? Fight back NOW, before the barricades go up and the center breaks.
The use of just (even deadly) force to stop the attacks of BLM and Alinsky terrorists threatening the lives of rally speakers and attendees is not wrong.
At private rallies deputized guards should also be used to carry out this just force.
How can they be "infiltrators" when the venue is open to all? And what's wrong with expressing one's 1st Amendment right?
Stop right there, I know your next statement. What I just wrote was an argument somebody here threw at me regarding the event in North Carolina.......
I am not talking about protecting oneself from violent protesters in our own rallies. What the poster of this thread is suggesting is that we infiltrate the opponents rallies and do to them what they are doing to us. This kind of activity solves nothing... we stand firm at our rallies, we do not give in to their gutter political tactics and we take this country back!
so you think we should suit up and go do to the opponents rallies what these paid thugs are doing to ours? Tell me, how does that solve anything! We stand firm on our own ground and keep doing what we have been doing and show them what the 1st Amendment really means!
>>We must fight fire with fire. We must infiltrate Bernie and Hilary’s rallies. We must have groups of people who interlock arms and sit in the middle of their rallies. We need to yell accurate statements like Rapist Enabler, Felon and Commie. We need to make them forcibly remove us. <<
WRONG!!
What’s wrong with you??? You sound like you are in the midst of a mental crisis, and really, someone really should trace your IP, call the police and have you committed.
I’ve been known to do exactly that, in the past. While I don’t have authority at this particular website, I’m sure there are those who do.
I agree with that tactic if "we" means that the infiltration is done legally by appropriate security forces, and that just (including deadly) force is applied to the terrorists when they become violent.
Tit-for-tat violence will only result in an escalation that will end up harming innocent people.
If someone throws a punch at you, do you throw a punch back, or do you stand there and pretend it didn’t happen? If someone shoots at you, do you shoot back or do you strap on your armor of indignation and hope it stops the next bullet?
Stop fooling yourself. This is going to come to blows at some point or we’re just going to have to keep laying down. And frankly, I’m getting bedsores.
Yours is the same mentality that the Tories had in the Revolutionary days. “What King George is doing isn’t right, but neither is fighting against those nice British soldiers.”
To hell with that.
So you agree, we should all suit up and go to their rallies and do to them what they have done at ours?
I have said nothing about cowering at our rallies like sissies, if someone comes at me they had better be prepared to leave the place a little bruised and swollen, but I do not condone going to their rallies and instigating violence.
That’s true; it just isn’t the same when you are dealing with people who don’t have to show up for work the next day, already have criminal records, etc.
They literally have nothing to lose.
What in the world are you talking about it? I’m not advocating violence in any way. The media and left have deemed such actions to be legitimate and justified so we should simply give them a taste of their own medicine. I only suggest one hundred percent peaceful protest even it means turning the other cheek.
Nope. They have the civil right to show the world they are retarded. At the very least, the world becomes more educated when learning how politically stupid some people are. Sanders and Clinton lost thousands of moderate voters last night.
Let’s go to Ted’s rallies. He likes violence against Republicans, being uniparty and all.
My point was more that we should not shirk from throwing these disruptors out of our rallies when they try to silence our voices. It was not that we should try to silence theirs.
I cannot remember a time when conservatives ever blocked a politician from speaking or for that matter anyone they disagreed with. This is a ignorant liberal fascist tactic.
I think protesting at Chris Browns’ events so that concert goers cannot attend might be fun, too. After all, what good for the goose, is good for the gander and he DID call for those protests at the Grammys. Time to give him/them a taste of their own medicine
This is not Trump's fault. It is the left bringing a gun to a knife fight, a classic move if you are fighting a bigger opponent. Trump is winning and the left is losing.
Most of the problem is manufactured by the GOP & the media.
We need to be in front of every network affiliate in every city, demanding they report the news instead of making it up.
Nothing changes until we confront this media.
A point I never disagreed with, in fact, I never even addressed it. My initial post was in regards to the title of the post & the insinuation that we should go to their rallies and act like them, rather than doing what is right by the 1st Amendment which is standing our ground and kicking them out, by force if needed, from our turf.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.