[Repeal 16-17]

Civil unions solve the problem.

Civil unions are simply marriages under a different name. I care more about the substance.

[MrB]

“Civil unions” were offered up as a compromise,
but the homosexuals insisted it HAD TO BE CALLED MARRIAGE.

Now that exposes that the legalities of a marriage weren’t the impetus for this destruction of the definition of marriage,

but the destruction of marriage as an institution was the goal all along.

[fwdude]

Civil unions are simply marriages under a different name. I care more about the substance.

Amen. The same fascist recognition required from others will be required for civil unions as for "marriages." Likely, there would be no substantive difference. It's like calling strychnine "wine."