Since 1869, Nature has been a respected source of scientific information.
1 posted on
02/28/2016 8:52:32 PM PST by
gasport
To: gasport
Yes, and this is very surprising, because Nature has heretofore been largely unsympathetic to any position but that of the warmist-alarmists.
2 posted on
02/28/2016 8:55:58 PM PST by
FredZarguna
(Billy was a simple country boy. You might say a cockeyed optimist...)
To: gasport
Because Anthropogenic Global Climate Disruption is a hoax and that bright round hot light in the sky is what effects the climate the most.
We are much more at risk for a new ice age than a massive warm up and warm is better than cold.
4 posted on
02/28/2016 8:59:40 PM PST by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: gasport
I think Nature is still on the AGW side here.
To: gasport
Professor of Meterology Leo DiCrapio just won the Oscar for best actor and he went on a gorebull warming rant for his acceptance speech. Algore must be proud.
6 posted on
02/28/2016 9:04:00 PM PST by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
To: gasport
If politicians and their money men figured out a way to scam taxpayer money by being against Global Warming
they would do an about face so fast it would break the sound barrier.
7 posted on
02/28/2016 9:04:02 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth -- Mike Tyson)
To: gasport
The Global Warming slowdown was caused by Global Warming.
8 posted on
02/28/2016 9:05:54 PM PST by
eyedigress
((Old storm chaser from the west))
To: gasport
Warming is a matter of perspective...
11 posted on
02/28/2016 9:17:07 PM PST by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: gasport
This article is an example of why it is so tragic that climate science has been so horribly politicized. There is no general theory of climate but the progressives act as if there is one that says “it’s a man made global catastrophe and we’re all gonna roast”. Any deviation will be punished by academic death. It is good to see this in Nature.
12 posted on
02/28/2016 9:17:23 PM PST by
JimSEA
To: gasport
Could it be because AGW does not exist?
To: gasport
Since 1869, Nature has been a respected source of scientific information.I guess they have decided to go with CHANGE and HOPE.
26 posted on
02/28/2016 10:02:26 PM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: gasport
Making sense of the early-2000s warming slowdown ?????
Try making sense of the “sky is falling” global warming farce by the “chicken littles” in academia over these past years.
First, make something up and then express alarm when the lie is found out. Yep! Academia really does exist in another world removed from reality.
40 posted on
02/29/2016 4:11:20 AM PST by
DH
(Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
To: gasport
How about the truth? It works here. They lied about “warming” and now the accumulated data prove they lied. Algore is another problem Trump can help us get rid of.
41 posted on
02/29/2016 4:47:51 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson