This would be nice — obviously the general election is what matters. Now watch the RINOe go wild with this one.
A prediction made on historical lookback
I’d like to see how his model accounted for the 2000 election before passing judgement on it.
Is that 97% based on an honest election with only legitimate voters voting and an honest vote count? Neither condition will prevail. Because the Republican Party has sworn to a Judge that it will never contest vote fraud elections are wide open for overt and covert vote fraud and for Soros to manipulate the vote count in the 11 states(including Florida) for which his company is the official tabulator.
For sake of intelligent discussion, instead of, “Oh, Beck is a crazy moron, yada yada”, Beck quoted a bunch of polls showing Trump does not have a chance of beating her.
What gives?
I understand statistics and this prof’s model is likely multi-variate, pretty complex and has a lot of variables which with sensitivity analysis, he changes, puts in best cast to worst case for each and pumps out a percentage...however, it is still crap in, crap out.
It would be nice to know what his assumptions are, however.
Any thoughts anyone?
Fine if Trump wins, but no one can say with certainty what’s inside until we elect him.
I’ve heard that before, too.
The 3% of losing only occurs if Trump hires Romney advisors.....
I agree. Trump will roll over Killary like Patton on his way to East Germany.
Nixon would have won except for Mayor Daly in Chicago manufacturing votes for Kennedy, so the model was correct, except for corruption and cheating the system!..................
This seems to agree with DNC internal polling. The WAPO is even trying to get the GOP to redouble its efforts to dump Trump.
Does the 97% and 99% include all forms of election and voter fraud?
Trump will put every State in the Union into play!