More like a safe maker being ordered to crack their own safe: their whole point in making the thing in the first place was that NOBODY could get inside without the code/key. Should the safe maker crack their own safe (under duress) customer confidence plummets; if done right, they simply can’t crack it.
Any precedent for compelling a safe maker being ordered to crack their own safe?
Limited use warrants vs. metadata mass storage — which do you prefer?