Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Donald Trump could win the US Republican presidential nomination
The Times of India ^ | Sunday, February 21, 2016 | AFP

Posted on 02/21/2016 12:49:34 PM PST by Jyotishi

Edited on 02/21/2016 1:15:46 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: JoSixChip
the majority of those votes will go to Trump because he is the real outsider.

So far, 2/3 of the Republican voters didn't want Trump. They had a chance, and said hell no.
Not everyone is voting on emotions alone. They want to know what the candidates are going to do, and not just "Hope n Change." They know what happened last time a candidate got elected by a slogan.
Yes, people are angry at Washington for selling us out, but most aren't willing to knee jerk for a guy who simply pretends he's angry, too. People want more than that.
"I'm Gonna Make America Great Again" just isn't enough information.

21 posted on 02/21/2016 1:30:37 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mears

If it takes almost 70 years and a campaign for the presidency to figure out where you stand on easy (right versus wrong) issues, then no amount of evolution is going to help. Trumps biggest problem is his consistency on any given issue erodes depending on the latest poll. MALLEABLE and a hollow core is not something anyone should strive for in life.


22 posted on 02/21/2016 1:32:17 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
So far, 2/3 of the Republican voters didn't want Trump. They had a chance, and said hell no.

That is just silly. By that logic, 80% of the republican voters don't want cruz, and a similar 80% don't want rubio. cruz has no path to winning the nomination with Trump in the race, and Trump is far ahead of cruz. cruz's only option, unless he wants rubio to win over Trump, is to drop out and support Trump.
23 posted on 02/21/2016 1:34:25 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

“MALLEABLE and a hollow core is not something anyone should strive for in life.”

I certainly can’t argue with that.

I just pray the the citizens of this great country make the correct choice.

..


24 posted on 02/21/2016 1:38:06 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: euram
Trump is expected to win NV quite handily on Tuesday.

Because he'll probably get his usual 30% (give or take a few) and the other 4 will have to split whats left.
After NV, hopefully the field will narrow to 3, and then the race can begin.
What's important to me when it comes to NV is how many people do NOT vote for Trump (Because I'm a Cruz supporter). That tells me the % the last man standing (The non-Trump candidate) will receive in the end.
Trump votes are emotional. Cruz votes are intellectual. Rubio votes are security (as in not good with changing things like the status quo.)
People will resonate to who reflects them the most. Candidates who do not reflect give people the creeps. There's no connection. That's why those who do not support Trump now never will but those who support an intellectual will gravitate to the nearest thing to an intellectual, or the nearest thing to a security candidate if they feel safer with the status quo. An intellectual wouldn't understand Trumnp no more than an emotional would understand Cruz.


25 posted on 02/21/2016 1:45:42 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
That is just silly. By that logic, 80% of the republican voters don't want cruz, and a similar 80% don't want rubio

Where did your 80% come from?

Right now the not-Trump vote is split between not-Trumps. Once that field narrows, the not-Trump candidate left will get the not-Trump vote.

26 posted on 02/21/2016 1:48:30 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Ah, another donkey rides to the rescue!

27 posted on 02/21/2016 1:49:38 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Foreigners did not say that about Obama. They loved him, they worshiped him, and now they’re feeling the pain just like we are.


28 posted on 02/21/2016 1:52:04 PM PST by WMarshal (Who in the Republican Party will be brave enough to name Obama a traitor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

Worked for Clinton when Perot ran third party when Clinton could only secure 43% of the vote.


29 posted on 02/21/2016 1:55:55 PM PST by Slyfox (Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Right now the not-Trump vote is split between not-Trumps. Once that field narrows, the not-Trump candidate left will get the not-Trump vote.

You assume it's the not Trump vote, not the not cruz or not rubio vote. You might want to review what happens when you assume too much. And let me just say, I am not the ass in this conversation.
30 posted on 02/21/2016 2:03:32 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Trump could win the general election with a plurality. If Bloomberg or some other third party candidate gets in, he could win even if a majority of voters pick someone else.

The fact he has high negatives don’t count for much in a crowded field.


31 posted on 02/21/2016 2:06:30 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Here is your not Trump vote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3400015/posts


32 posted on 02/21/2016 2:08:11 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
You assume it's the not Trump vote, not the not cruz or not rubio vote.

People are drawn to people like themselves. Birds of a feather flock together. Water seeks it's own level. Great minds think alike.
That's how I know those are non-Trump votes. The other candidates are not running on the anger ticket, so only the very angry will be drawn to Trump. The others will be drawn to other things. For example, I'm drawn to Cruz because of his strict Constitutionalism. I don't believe anger and revenge are the answer. That's why I'm not drawn at all to Trump. I think going back to our Constitutional principals is the answer to saving this country from where it's headed.

33 posted on 02/21/2016 2:26:04 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Seems that about 86% of the republican voters disagree with you:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3400015/posts


34 posted on 02/21/2016 2:28:30 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
For example, I'm drawn to Cruz because of his strict Constitutionalism.

I'm sure it was cruz's strict Constitutionalism that forced him to vote to transfer the Constitutionally mandated Congressional powers of the senate to the executive branch with cruz's TPA and corker bill votes, right?
35 posted on 02/21/2016 2:32:32 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
When one of them drops out, which I think should be cruz at this point, the majority of those votes will go to Trump because he is the real outsider.

Those not running on the anger ticket will have no use for Trump. They can't relate to his rhetoric. They'll choose the alternative.
If you've noticed, so far 2 out of 3 Republican voters did NOT vote for Trump. They didn't care if he was inside or out. If it didn't matter then, why would it matter later?

36 posted on 02/21/2016 2:36:40 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
What's important to me when it comes to NV is how many people do NOT vote for Trump (Because I'm a Cruz supporter).

So you are a Rubio supporter after all?

37 posted on 02/21/2016 2:38:00 PM PST by itsahoot (1st impression. Trump is a fumble mouthed blowhard that can't speak in complete sentences. VoteTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Those not running on the anger ticket will have no use for Trump. They can't relate to his rhetoric. They'll choose the alternative. If you've noticed, so far 2 out of 3 Republican voters did NOT vote for Trump. They didn't care if he was inside or out. If it didn't matter then, why would it matter later?

You're barking at the moon son. I have already completely and utterly debunked everything you just said, and yet here you are saying it again.
38 posted on 02/21/2016 2:41:34 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Seems that about 86% of the republican voters disagree with you:

Seriously? I'd even vote yes in that poll. Of course Trump could beat Hillary. Anyone could! This race is for the Republicans to lose!
If they ask me if Cruz could win the general election, I'd say yes to that too. Even Rubio could be Hillary.
Geeze. Talk about a slanted poll. The only Republican they asked about was Trump! What about all the others? They'd all get 86% too!

39 posted on 02/21/2016 2:41:42 PM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Seriously? I'd even vote yes in that poll.

See, I knew we'd bring you around to being a Trump supporter. Congratulations on not being a loser anymore.
40 posted on 02/21/2016 2:43:15 PM PST by JoSixChip (Ted Cruz (R-Goldman Sachs) - DC Values)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson