To: rpierce
How is it that the phone could be in the hands of a county guy?
Weren’t the Feds there on the scene immediately?
10 posted on
02/19/2016 5:14:01 PM PST by
digger48
To: digger48
It was a remote change by the county guy. He never had the phone.
To: digger48
#10 yeah but they were trying to hide from public because barky didn’t want to o call it
Islamic terrorism
26 posted on
02/19/2016 5:20:47 PM PST by
VRWCarea51
(The original 1998 version)
To: digger48
How is it that the phone could be in the hands of a county guy? It's a cellphone. You can send data to it from pretty much anywhere.
59 posted on
02/19/2016 5:30:47 PM PST by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: digger48
No. Local authorities only.
61 posted on
02/19/2016 5:30:59 PM PST by
meatloaf
To: digger48
The shooter was a county employee.
Big fat fail on part of the county.
164 posted on
02/19/2016 6:46:11 PM PST by
rwilson99
(Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
To: digger48
Maybe it was synced to several devices including a work station and got prompted to the Tech Guy.
But unless the Tech Guy is also a collaborator wouldn't there be notations of what the new code was?
Yet again maybe there was an out of USA device that was used through sync to change the USA PASSWORD from Islamland somewhere?
Why not remove the chip and do a work around?
318 posted on
02/23/2016 3:22:27 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson