Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jch10

Probably because she actually did give him the information, although she carped about it later. Reluctant compliance is still compliance.


9 posted on 02/19/2016 6:03:40 AM PST by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan
“I felt uncomfortable knowing I had to relay vital and confidential information to someone who may not be trustworthy,” the dispatcher later told her supervisor.”......

It was and is NOT her decision to relay information to the sheriff. She is (should be was) and employee of the county and it her duty to forward information to the TOP LAW authority in her county. End of story. When the dust settles, the sheriff could fire the dispatcher for not doing her job and MAY possibly be charged with obstruction. Might be interesting how that comes out.

10 posted on 02/19/2016 6:34:08 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson