Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unlearner

I didn’t say they were being neutral. I said you can take millions of dollars from a company and insult their customers. Manny can say what he wants and you can agree or not and you can boycott Nike. I really don’t care, but Nike made a business call which they had a right to do


9 posted on 02/18/2016 9:43:07 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: morphing libertarian

“Nike made a business call which they had a right to do”

They could have simply canceled his contract without commenting on the merits of his position. They officially share the homosexual activist position. Anyone who thinks homosexual acts are wrong are “abhorrent” to Nike. They think it is okay to call my view abhorrent, but calling deviant sex abhorrent is supposedly wrong.

This is Nike’s statement:

“We find Manny Pacquiao’s comments abhorrent. Nike strongly opposes discrimination of any kind and has a long history of supporting and standing up for the rights of the LGBT community.”

They are openly opposed to social conservatism and traditional beliefs. They claim to oppose discrimination of “any” kind, but they discriminate against conservatives and Christians. They don’t add how Nike has a long history of supporting conservatives and people of traditional faith. (Hint. It’s because they haven’t and they don’t.) They do not want me as a customer.

And you may think it is about the bottom line. It isn’t. Chick-fil-A proves that. The homosexuals attacked Chick-fil-A just because the owner donated to a pro-family group out of his personal fortune. But their boycott backfired because more people agree with the traditional family view. Nike’s decision represents either the personal beliefs of the executives or their realization that they will personally benefit by playing along with the nondiscrimination charade.


11 posted on 02/18/2016 10:37:14 PM PST by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

No one said that Nike didn’t have a right to be pro homo. We also have a right to be anti-Nike. Oh well.


14 posted on 02/19/2016 2:25:19 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: morphing libertarian

Romans 1

24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.


16 posted on 02/19/2016 2:35:48 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson