Posted on 02/16/2016 10:01:10 AM PST by C19fan
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. K.S., 2016 WL 482622 (parties initials’ changed to pseudonyms for ease of reading):
This case involves issues of custody, removal, and support surrounding an unusual agreement entered into between three friends to conceive and jointly raise a child in a tri-parenting arrangement. [Olivia] is a female minor child born in 2009. Plaintiff, [Doug], is the biological father of [Olivia], and [Kristine] is the child’s biological mother. Plaintiff, [Shawn], is [Doug]’s same-sex spouse, who has bonded with and has become a psychological parent of [Olivia]. . . . [T]he court awards joint legal and joint residential custody of [Olivia] to all three parties and denies the application of [Kristine] to remove and relocate the child to a different state. . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
As bad as Child Protective Services are in most states; they are necessary.
In this case - remove the child from these weirdo’s and place it in a normal foster home.
Feel so bad for this child.
Selfish perverts.
If they’re all the parents, then they can ALL be ‘married,’ right?
It’s a ‘civil right,’ found right under the right to redefine reality for the rest of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
