Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76

Somebody was there, somebody inspected.

Why would anybody bother to assassinate him NOW? Why not earlier in Obie’s presidency? With more dems in the senate and a better chance to get confirmed whoever he wanted? And if this conspiracy is so brilliant, what makes you think an autopsy would break it?

Really, the paranoids need to get over themselves. They sound like morons, and make all other conservatives sound stupid by association.


55 posted on 02/15/2016 11:50:00 AM PST by discostu (This is a different kind of flying... all together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

The judge performed the inquest because the cause of death was unknown. So far so good.[1]

How did the judge determine whether or not an autopsy was necessary to determine or confirm the nature and cause of death?[2]

The judge did not see the body, how could she make such a determination? Apparently she relied on statements from LEO who arrived on scene after the death. Did LEO determine the cause of death?

_ _ _ _

[1] Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 49.04 (a) A justice of the peace shall conduct an inquest into the death of a person who dies in the county served by the justice if: (3) the body or a body part of a person is found, the cause or circumstances of death are unknown

[2] Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 49.10. (e) A justice of the peace shall order an autopsy performed on a body if: (1) the justice determines that an autopsy is necessary to determine or confirm the nature and cause of death;

[3] Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 49.01 (2) “Inquest” means an investigation into the cause and circumstances of the death of a person, and a determination, made with or without a formal court hearing, as to whether the death was caused by an unlawful act or omission.


56 posted on 02/15/2016 11:52:14 AM PST by Ray76 (Our gov has become hideously deformed by the hand of the Dem-Rep-Uniparty. They must be abolished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

Because Valerie Jarrett had said that Obama’s last term would be payback and they had judges ready to go. Because Scalia helped rule Obama’s EPA power grab as unconstitutional 4? days earlier. Because it was reported that Obama wants to make his “legacy” permanent. Because Obama said back in July of 2008 that he would be POTUS for “the next 8 to 10 years” and even if the North Korean or Iranian EMP attack happens when Obama is in South America with his communist enemies of America in November and December, the Islamist sleeper cells that Venezuela had been flying in from Iran on direct unchecked flights (and then laundered their identities so they would be OK even if they were captured after going through the door that Obama has been holding open for them) may have a difficult time finishing off this nation within the extra 2 years if America is still armed...

Those are a few dots that form the outline of what’s going on. There are a lot more dots that could flesh it out but I suspect you’re not really willing to listen anyway.


84 posted on 02/15/2016 3:23:35 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson