Replies

Anyone who disagrees with you must be from DU, or even Lindsey Graham himself I guess.

I cannot even begin to untangle your post. The very first sentence is completely disconnected from anything I “claimed”. I don’t feel the urge to clarify it with you further since every post of yours to me has been a direct and personal insult. You can jam it as far as I m concerned. No sense discussing it with you.

Oops, you're right about that first sentence. I mis-read you're first paragraph with "traitor" and now see what you meant. Strike that reference from me about "traitor" in my first paragraph, in fact just ignore the whole paragraph. My bad.

However, the rest of my comment is dead-on point, and quite simple to understand. You did reference "constitutionality" and I pointed out that it is perfectly constitutional to examine to Dumbo's appointment, and then summarily dismiss it. Rinse, Repeat until he leaves town. Simple.

The thrust of the comment is to fight the (D)ummies head on and defeat them this time, or else. It is in stark contrast to what you originally ( and still? ) recommended ... surrender.

Surrender is NOT an option. Period.