To: BenLurkin
The upside to this is that it prevents LA real estate developers from building cities in the desert that’ll have to depend on water from as far away as British Columbia and the Great Lakes.
4 posted on
02/12/2016 12:06:01 PM PST by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: MeganC
The upside to this is that it prevents LA real estate developers from building cities in the desert that’ll have to depend on water from as far away as British Columbia and the Great Lakes. There's no upside when the states cede land to the feds. HOW something is done matters just as much as WHAT is done. California should have done this at the STATE level. You really think this can't now be changed at the federal level, now that they have this land? What rot. Mussolini made the trains run on time, too. But at what cost?
5 posted on
02/12/2016 12:15:45 PM PST by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: MeganC
No cities were going to be there anyway.
9 posted on
02/12/2016 12:44:59 PM PST by
MarMema
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson