Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

They should at least toss Trump a bone. The guy is getting 65 to 85% win ratings on polls across the internet.

That makes these comments look silly.


9 posted on 02/06/2016 10:57:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Trump’s online polls are 10-15 above what they usually are.


17 posted on 02/06/2016 11:07:15 PM PST by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
He tossed Trump a bone.

But he wasn't really a loser because of the likelihood that Rubio took a step back. Call it a draw for Trump.

BTW, Trump was booed - his antics flopped, his repertoire is stale.

18 posted on 02/06/2016 11:10:10 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
They should at least toss Trump a bone. The guy is getting 65 to 85% win ratings on polls across the internet.

Well, no.
Trump isn't perfect and he is shooting blanks on the eminent domain issue.

I plan to vote for trump, but certainly not for his stand on the E.D. issue. He is dead wrong. A rational man will admit this sooner or later.

His entire explanation confounds "public benefit" with increased tax revenue, which is a sick perversion of the concept. The voters of the jurisdiction must have the final word, not an unaccountable "bought" judge or the power hungry local elected criminals as to what qualifies as a general public benefit.

Certainly an unsupported assertion should never be enough.

Even the magic Negro has failed to succeed with the arbitrary and capricious attempt to sell assertion as fact.

It's simple.
A new multilane urban street connecting existing isolated neighborhoods with each other providing faster access by emergency services is a general public benefit.

Providing access to a casino or new shopping center with no similar benefit to existing neighborhoods is not.
Note that providing similar security access to future neighborhoods is a circular self-serving argument, unless the street involved is part of the city general plan which, at least in California, is required by state law to be updated regularly to fit changing conditions.

38 posted on 02/06/2016 11:33:22 PM PST by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson