Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton defends Wall Street speaking fees: ‘That’s what they offered’
The Hill ^ | 2/03/16 | Jonathan Easley

Posted on 02/04/2016 2:14:07 AM PST by Libloather

Hillary Clinton on Wednesday night defended accepting huge speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, arguing that it won't influence the way she treats the banking industry.

Speaking at CNN's Democratic presidential forum, anchor Anderson Cooper pressed Clinton on whether it had been a mistake for her to reel in more than $200,000 per speech for three speeches to the Wall Street giant.

"Look, I made speeches to lots of groups. I told them what I thought. I answered questions," Clinton said.

"But did you have to be paid $675,000?," Cooper asked.

"Well I don't know," Clinton responded. "That's what they offered."

The crowd burst into laughter as Clinton explained that "every secretary of State I know has done that."

Cooper shot back that usually the secretary of State is not preparing to run for president.

"To be honest I wasn't committed to running," Clinton said. "I didn't know whether I would run or not."

Clinton said she would not be influenced by the money.

"Anybody who knows me that thinks they can influence me - name anything they've influenced me on," she said. "Just name one thing. I'm out here every day saying I'm going to shut them down, I'm going after them, I'm going to jail them if they should be jailed. I'm going to break them up."

"They're not giving me very much money now, I can tell you that much," she said. "Fine with me."

Earlier in the night, Sanders said a super-PAC supporting Clinton for president had taken in $15 million so far from Wall Street donors.

Clinton claimed Wednesday night that 90 percent of the donors to her actual campaign were "small dollar donors."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chutzpah; clinton; fees; goldmansachs; newyorkvalues; street; wall
Is there a special tax rate for bribes?
1 posted on 02/04/2016 2:14:07 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

H-> is on drugs. Like the $ drug.


2 posted on 02/04/2016 2:22:06 AM PST by Paladin2 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Listen Ill come out and say I’m against you, you will whine and cry, I will make ideas with you behind the curtain we will shake on it and continue being friends and the people will know nothing and once again be the idiot in the room


3 posted on 02/04/2016 2:56:35 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

Two words........Bull Sh^t!

The woman is and has been delusional for years and needs to be put aside (meaning jail). I have heard all I ever care to about Hitlary, Billy Bob and the supposed “Dr” Chelsa Clinton.


4 posted on 02/04/2016 3:10:42 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

“Well I don’t know,” Clinton responded. “That’s what they offered.” ........

Where I, and many others come from its called BRIBERY.


5 posted on 02/04/2016 3:12:39 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Cattle futures...

Hey I made a smart investment.


6 posted on 02/04/2016 3:37:04 AM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think that if you’re serving in government and speaking anywhere as a result of holding some high office or capacity, to any group, then any speaking fees should go directly to the U.S. Treasury to help retire the debt.


7 posted on 02/04/2016 3:41:38 AM PST by Sirius Lee (Cruz or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Did the thing just say she's for sale to the highest bidder?

wow

8 posted on 02/04/2016 3:43:56 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The crowd burst into laughter as Clinton explained that "every secretary of State I know has done that."

Ah yes, the same excuse used by little Johnny in the third grade when the teacher catches him acting up. Instead of acknowledging he was wrong and accepting responsibility for his actions, he points to others in the class and says: What are you picking on me for? They were doing it too!

9 posted on 02/04/2016 3:46:48 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She’s a whore, she’s always been a whore, that’s why democrats like her so much...


10 posted on 02/04/2016 3:53:42 AM PST by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Wrong Hillary. That is what you accepted. A normal human being would consider the implications and demand the fee be lowered.


11 posted on 02/04/2016 7:00:50 AM PST by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Exactly. You are on the taxpayer dime, your ‘fees’ go back to the Treasury.

Where’s all the judges that would take “everyone else was doing it” and let someone off??


12 posted on 02/04/2016 7:24:26 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson