Posted on 02/01/2016 6:07:07 PM PST by Libloather
The federal judge overseeing the main Hillary Clinton e-mail lawsuit has scheduled a status conference for next week to see where the headline-generating case goes from here.
Judge Rudolph Contreras will ask the lawyers at the hearing on February 9 where the lawsuit stands, now that the State Department has said it will finish disclosing the relevant documents by the end of the month.
February 9 also happens to be the day of the New Hampshire primary.
A year ago, Jason Leopold, an investigative reporter for VICE News, filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department, seeking records related to Mrs. Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. The lawsuit took on new prominence with the disclosure last March that she used a private e-mail server.
(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...
They want to see how Hillary does in Iowa and NH — only then will the judge be able to determine the seriousness of the charges.
Joe Biden eagerly awaits the ruling.
Or threats?
So this is a Civil case?
Does the judge take bribes?
On July 28, 2011, President Barack Obama nominated Contreras to fill a vacancy on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.[3] He would replace Judge Ricardo M. Urbina who took senior status in 2011. On October 4, 2011, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on his nomination and on October 3, 2011, reported his nomination to the floor of the Senate.
“Judge Sets Hearing Date in Hillary Clinton E-mail Case”
Should read, “...sets date to dismiss HC email case...”
Appointed by Obama. So...yeah...it's likely.
Yes...civil case fo release of e-mail doc’s.
Let us hope the Judge has enough integrity to overlooks the fact she is a woman and a Socialist Democrat.
Obama appointee.
either way, its patently obvious that the D’s cannot run Hillary unless they want to punt the election (at the top level and probably at all levels beneath, too)
I bet they’ll run Biden, since he’s right there ... but maybe they’ll find someone else (easier to sell to the voters)
These hearings are worthless. The obly way we will be rid of this evil Wiccan Marxist is if we get a President Trump or Cruz to issue an executive order or carry out a covert action to have her executed.
It's all about power. The other stuff you mention is of academic interest, at best.
That is what you call a forlorn hope.
“...Joe Biden eagerly awaits the ruling...”
Heard today that the deadline for registering as a candidate has expired...Biden (or anyone new) would have to be a “write-in” candidate...
The fix is in. Hillary will be “vindicated”
Why isn’t there a special prosecutor? Shouldn’t there be one?
“Let us hope the Judge has enough integrity to overlooks the fact she is a woman and a Socialist Democrat.”
Bad news, the judge is a Socialist Democrat also.
On July 28, 2011, President Barack Obama nominated Contreras to fill a vacancy on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. He would replace Judge Ricardo M. Urbina who took senior status in 2011. On October 4, 2011, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on his nomination and on October 3, 2011, reported his nomination to the floor of the Senate.
On March 22, 2012, the Senate confirmed Contreras in a voice vote. He received his commission on March 23, 2012.[4]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.