Leading ProLife Women Tell ProLife Voters-Don’t Vote for Donald TrumpCan’t Trust Him on Abortion

Life News ^ | January 26, 2016 | STEVEN ERTELT

[Alberta's Child]

Baloney.

The statement that "social conservatism is a luxury is about as idiotic as anything I've seen on FreeRepublic -- for two reasons:

1. Almost every destructive economic policy in this country can be tied to a disastrous social policy that has no basis in Natural Law.

2. Political candidates who describe themselves as "economic conservatives and social liberals" usually end up being reliably liberal on economic issues anyway.

You're certainly free to ignore these points, but you do so at your own peril.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Are you saying that you aren’t old enough to remember those debates?

I'm not talking "debates." I'm talking about civil disobedience and just flat-out ignoring the ruling.

How come that didn't happen?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

What good is any other issue if you are willing to sacrifice the lives of your own future on the alter of 9 tyrants in black robes? They should dress like butchers since that is what they are.

Hey, I agree with you. I'm just saying fighting for abortion restrictions and no taxpayer funding of abortions would save thousands of babies' lives NOW. Then you work to ban it as a long-term measure. Instead of going for these hail-mary passes that don't go anywhere and abortion continues.

[j.argese]

1. Agreed, which is why government should stay out of social policy business.

2. 90% of the time agree. Which is why government should stay out of social policy business.

[RasterMaster]

I think defunding and prosecution of Planned Parenthood would be a great place to start, but no reason to pop the corks and call it a day.

[Alberta's Child]

Fair enough. What would constitute an unwelcome intrusion of government into “social policy business,” in your mind?

[saradippity]

You have an amazing ability to capture truth in a nutshell. Thanks