Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

If Trump starts by winning the Iowa caucus, and continues to win the subsequent primaries; what’s the incentive for Trump to debate anybody? OTOH, if that starts happening; neither Cruz nor anyone else has anything to lose if they go one on one.

Sure they’d like a crack at the winner, just for the chance to maybe land a lucky punch. But why should Trump waste his time like that. They have all had 6 months and 6 debates to make their case. Trump has no obligation to give any one of his opponents any free punches.


70 posted on 01/27/2016 1:17:51 PM PST by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Tucker39

That’s a fair point, but Trump hasn’t won a primary yet.


81 posted on 01/27/2016 1:22:37 PM PST by JediJones ("Beautiful, famous, successful, married - I've had them all, secretly." -Trump on women in 2007 book)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Tucker39
If Trump starts by winning the Iowa caucus, and continues to win the subsequent primaries; what’s the incentive for Trump to debate anybody? OTOH, if that starts happening; neither Cruz nor anyone else has anything to lose if they go one on one. Sure they’d like a crack at the winner, just for the chance to maybe land a lucky punch. But why should Trump waste his time like that. They have all had 6 months and 6 debates to make their case. Trump has no obligation to give any one of his opponents any free punches.

That's why Reagan skipped the Iowa debates. The result? He lost the state despite being a near-native son who started his radio station career there. He never skipped a debate after that.

86 posted on 01/27/2016 1:27:09 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Tucker39
If Trump starts by winning the Iowa caucus, and continues to win the subsequent primaries; what’s the incentive for Trump to debate anybody? OTOH, if that starts happening; neither Cruz nor anyone else has anything to lose if they go one on one.

If he wins Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina then I agree, there is nothing in it for him. But he hasn't won them yet, has he? Cruz is still his main opponent, the only one who has a decent shot at upsetting Trump's plans. So why not drive a stake through his heart and whip him in a one-on-one debate between New Hampshire and Iowa? He could end it once and for all if he can out think, out maneuver, out debate Ted Cruz head-to-head. Trump would conclusively prove that Cruz is a loser. Isn't that worth it? Or is Trump afraid of embarrassing himself?

97 posted on 01/27/2016 1:39:04 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson