It's painfully obvious that it wasn't necessary. I read the one screed by the socially liberal Boaz of Cato. Although I have supported and valued Cato for defending the Bill of Rights, Boaz should not have pretended to defend some sort of conservative value in his poorly written piece e.g. "He [Trump] doesn't talk about policy or working with Congress."
First, that is wrong, Trump has an entire website filled with specific policy. Second, Congress will work with him, at least the ones who actually represent the American people.
I have to explain as usual that I know Trump is not that conservative. Duh. What he promises to do is stop cultural rot. Curtail big government. Lower corporate taxes and regulation to make America great. That's enough for me.
This author is not a great thinker. He didn't even do his homework. But no no we're the ones who are making the thoughtless choice. Pshaw Lame.
I have to explain as usual that I know Trump is not that conservative. Duh. What he promises to do is stop cultural rot. Curtail big government. Lower corporate taxes and regulation to make America great. That’s enough for me.
So support of ethanol subsidies and calling for future regulations increasing ethanol additives is now good conservative policy?