Sarah Palin a No Show at Today’s Trump Events

Red State ^ | January 20, 2016 | Leon H. Wolf

[Cincinatus' Wife]

According to press releases issued by the Trump campaign, Palin was supposed to spend today (and the next several days) criss-crossing Iowa with Donald Trump, stumping for him. However, at the rally Trump held this morning, Palin was absent with no explanation from the Trump camp. Instead, Trump just took the stage for a little longer than planned.

The media inquired about Palin's absence and were basically given "no comment" in response.

[P-Marlowe]

She should have consulted with Phil Robertson before taking the plunge. I’m sure he would have told her that Trump is a Snake Oil Salesman and not “one of us.”

Trump is one of “them”. Now Sarah is one of “them” too.

[CedarDave]

Track Palin was in Sarah's home Tuesday when he assaulted his girl friend and threatened to kill himself with a semi-automatic rifle, and he was drunk. He was arrested without bail until the next day, which is today. Since Palin did not show up today with Trump as advertised, she is likely headed home to deal with the Track problem.

The assault took place Monday night (Sarah left for Iowa earlier that day). A picture was posted this morning with her and Todd walking toward Trump's plane soon to be enroute to Tulsa.

[Ditter]

I am listening on Fox right now to Palin speaking in Oklahoma. She is speaking better, still excitable but she sounds better. If she truly had just gotten the news about her son, I can understand her performance yesterday.

[Hoodat]

Red State hates Trump.

Last week, they hated Cruz. Two weeks before that, they hated Jeb. Next week, they'll hate Cruz again.

[lodi90]

Red State has been consistently anti Trump going back to last summer when they uninvited him.

[lodi90]

Sorry, I’ll take Sarah. You can have Goldman Sachs Values.

[caww]

Last night was the death of the Tea Party when Palin got in bed with Trump. ...........Cruz grassroots will certainly be filling that void as they have been all along.

Go Cruz Go!!!

[caww]

....”Red State has been consistently anti Trump going back to last summer when they uninvited him”....

and with good reason..

[caww]

...."Sarah really sounded so unpleasant yesterday that dogs must have been in agony".... Even Trump had to step back a little...understandably...

[P-Marlowe]

You can have Goldman Sachs Values.

You can have CLINTON FOUNDATION VALUES.

See tagline.

[caww]

Thumbs up!

[P-Marlowe]

How about HILLARY SECRET E-MAIL VALUES?

[Hoodat]

You may be interested in this:

The 10 Questions Hillary Clinton Should Have Been Asked on CNN

[mkjessup]

That's FUNNY!
Lol!

"The ability to laugh at ourselves affirms that all is not lost"
~ Royce Johnson

Have a nice evening. :)

[P-Marlowe]

Honestly, what is worse, mishandling top secret e-mails or not properly filling out a campaign finance reform required disclosure document.

Trump says that the Campaign Finance violation (which might result in a fine) is worse than what Clinton did (which might have gotten agents in the field killed and compromised our national security and could result in a long prison sentence?)

Trump has gone off the rails and a lot of Freepers are blindly following him.

He’s going to do a Howard Dean imitation real soon. Pray it happens before the caucus. (This one should have qualified, but the Trump people have a religious tie to him at this point).

[caww]

[caww]

...”He’s going to do a Howard Dean imitation real soon. Pray it happens before the caucus. (This one should have qualified, but the Trump people have a religious tie to him at this point).”....

Not so sure that will happen...his team is pinning him down pretty hard as they know this could easily happen....it really takes little to set him off....wouldn’t be surprised if he’s taking something now just to keep him calmer without loosing the Trumpster persona entirely.

[caww]

Well we know about these things and the truth of Trump...but it’s impossible to reason with Personality Cult Mobs....as we know from the past. It was the same thing with Obama mobs....the two are very similar just opposite sides.

[Marcella]

“Your concern is duly noted and for you to even dare to write publicly that you "wonder if she was under the influence of alcohol" is truly beneath you.”

I said it because I believe it is possible due to her behavior giving that speech. If it is not alcohol, then I think she is taking something else, and it could be a medicine, several I know of that can change behavior. She was “off” giving that speech. If the next one is like this one, then something is going on with her. If the next one is fine, then this one was an aberration.

[P-Marlowe]

It was the same thing with Obama mobs....the two are very similar just opposite sides.

I would argue that is two sides of the same coin.