Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected his (Plantiff, Mr. Sissel) suit in August, saying the primary purpose of the law wasn't to raise money.

And yet the basis on which they upheld the individual mandate was that the bill was a tax and permitted under the taxing power.

So which is it? Is it a revenue bill or something else?

7 posted on 01/19/2016 9:32:37 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TBP
Exactly, the elites see tax money completely different than you and I do.

Obamacare is nothing more than tax revenue from the middle-class to redistribute to the gibmedats.

14 posted on 01/19/2016 9:36:37 AM PST by PROCON (Proud CRUZader!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson