Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet
Judge Andy gets his predictions more often wrong than right. I would not bet any money on this, not a red cent.

The main point is that she is running for unconditional immunity, that is why she wants that office. It will require impeachment and conviction to remove the crook. None of the fanciful statutes about forfeit of office can touch Article II. Failing that office she would beg DingleBarry for a pardon. All kinds of Constitutional Crisis loom on the horizon.

It is time for enterprising journalists to badger her with the giant question no-one wants to ask her: If faced with indictment or threatened with impeachment will you follow Nixon's lead and resign the Presidency for the good of the country?

Other reporters might want to look into her comments as a member of the Watergate lynch mob. Keywords: Cambodia, secret war, incursions. Libya alone surpasses Nixon's wildest escapades. Isn't Kissinger still breathing? Hello. Is this thing on?

11 posted on 01/16/2016 3:42:38 AM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Democratic-Republican
-- The main point is that she is running for unconditional immunity --

See US v. Nixon and a handful of others.

Somebody said (and I thought it was funny), "too big to jail." She already has that, the presidency would just make her bigger still.

No matter how this plays out in the long run, she skates. Assuming the GOP gets the presidency and she is convicted of a crime - the GOP president would issue a pardon. Trump would, Cruz would, any of them would. Just to "heal."

14 posted on 01/16/2016 3:49:49 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Democratic-Republican

“Failing that office she would beg DingleBarry for a pardon.”

Democrats don’t beg. They bargain. He will pardon her and a substantial sum will find its way to his charitable foundation. It will be suitably laundered through third parties; a major book deal, a substantial stipend from some billionaire, a gift from Dubai.

Incidentally, his charitable foundation will dispense even less money to charities than hers does. She needed plausible deniability. He doesn’t. No one would ever dare question his dealings.


19 posted on 01/16/2016 4:02:24 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson