“The article also cites how on September 8 of last year, Trump was for bringing in Syrian refugees, but he changed his mind on the 9th.”
I am very familiar with that one, and it is probably on a video somewhere. That was a case of Bill O’Reilly not giving Trump the time to finish a thought.
The next day’s supposed change was to finish what O’Reilly would not allow him to do the day before.
Has anyone ever witnessed Bill O’Reilly ever allow someone the time to complete a sentence or develop a thought by not interrupting. People usually explain various points about a subject in order to explain how they arrive at a conclusion about the subject, and then give their conclusion based on those aforementioned points. O’Reilly will nine times out of ten cut them off just as they arrive at the conclusion part. Hannity does that, but not nearly as bad. Limbaugh is the only one who allows people to make a point.
This example makes me pass on reading the article.
Levin was mulling out loud yesterday about when he would endorse a candidate, or in other words, when he should endorse Cruz.
What’s most interesting to me is that CR hit on Trump yesterday dovetailed exactly with the Cruz campaign talking points of the day. That timing couldn’t happen without some coordination between CR & the Cruz campaign. Will Levin be reporting this like & kind donation to the Cruz campaign?