Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EIA: US shale oil output to decline 116,000 b/d in February
Oil & Gas Journal ^ | 01/11/2016 | OGJ editors

Posted on 01/14/2016 5:15:51 AM PST by thackney

Crude oil production in February from seven major US shale plays is expected to fall 116,000 b/d to 4.83 million b/d, according to the US Energy Information Administration’s latest Drilling Productivity Report (DPR). The agency last month also projected a 116,000-b/d loss for January (OGJ Online, Dec. 7, 2015).

The DPR focuses on the Bakken, Eagle Ford, Haynesville, Marcellus, Niobrara, Permian, and Utica, which altogether accounted for 95% of US crude oil production increases and all US natural gas production increases during 2011-13.

Production from the Eagle Ford is seen dropping 72,000 b/d during the month to 1.15 million b/d, followed by a 24,000-b/d loss in the Bakken to 1.1 million b/d and 23,000-b/d loss in the Niobrara to 371,000 b/d.

Continuing to demonstrate its resiliency, the Permian is forecast to increase 5,000 b/d to 2.04 million b/d. New-well oil production/rig across the seven plays is expected to increase by a rig-weighted average of 3 b/d to 497 b/d. The Niobrara is again seen leading the way, expected to post a 16-b/d jump to 726 b/d, while the Utica is seen rising 12 b/d to 294 b/d and Eagle Ford rising 9 b/d to 804 b/d.

Shale gas production in February is expected to decrease 405 MMcfd to 43.72 bcfd, mostly reflecting a 225-MMcfd loss in the Marcellus to 15.22 bcfd, 140-MMcfd loss in the Eagle Ford to 6.46 bcfd, and 76-MMcfd loss in the Niobrara to 4.1 bcfd.

Increases are seen from the Utica, up 43 MMcfd to 3.25 bcfd; Haynesville, up 16 MMcfd to 6.23 bcfd; and Permian, edging up 1 MMcfd to 6.91 bcfd.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: North Dakota; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: energy; methane; oil; opec; petroleum; shale

1 posted on 01/14/2016 5:15:52 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

And the Saudi’s smile.


2 posted on 01/14/2016 5:49:43 AM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

It was only a matter of time.


3 posted on 01/14/2016 6:36:11 AM PST by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

What? Because of electric and toy cars consume less gasoline?
Keep the prices down, screw the Saudis and Russians!


4 posted on 01/14/2016 7:29:01 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepeesssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian
Because of electric and toy cars consume less gasoline?

This is a reduction in supply of oil, not the consumption of oil.

5 posted on 01/14/2016 7:35:52 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney
That's for one small region. Overall, production is waaaay up. For twelve years, it was around five million barrels per day from 1999-2011, pretty consistently (a small dip for a few months in 2005 aside). In 2012, it was mostly in the six million range... 2013, seven million.... 2014, eight million... last year through OCT, over nine million every month since the previous OCT. We are up 80 percent over 2011 in US daily production. That's very good news. A small, short-term dip in one location is not a reason to panic or despair... but it is also worth keeping an eye on.

eia.gov cite

(However, in OCT of last year, there are several news stories about oil execs warning of falling production...)

6 posted on 01/14/2016 7:39:43 AM PST by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
That's for one small region.

That is almost all of the production growth we have had in 5 years (those regions, not volume).

Overall, production is waaaay up.

Due to the shale fields, which have started declining.

A small, short-term dip in one location

It is a reversed trend, not a single dip. And it is not limited to one location. Eagle Ford, Bakken, Niobrara have all had several months of declining numbers. The Permian, which grew far slower than those others, has been declining its growth rate, but not yet in total decline. It has a lot of more traditional well types.

The full report and other graphs are at:

https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf

7 posted on 01/14/2016 7:51:18 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

All of a sudden Saudis discovered less supply of oil?
There is an explosion of oil supply thanks to fracking, more gasoline on the market, prices dropping, which Saudis and other members of oil cartel do not like or they are feeling the pinch.


8 posted on 01/14/2016 8:02:08 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepeesssssed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian

This article is not about Saudi oil production.

It is about the ongoing declining oil production from US shale due to the lower oil prices.

The decline in our oil imports from OPEC stopped a year ago and have begun to slowly rise.


9 posted on 01/14/2016 8:11:35 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson