Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Roots of Black Lives Matter

The Black Lives Matter [1] movement (BLM) casts itself as a spontaneous uprising born of inner city frustration, but is, in fact, the latest and most dangerous face of a web of well-funded communist/socialist organizations that have been agitating against America for decades. Its agitation has provoked police killings and other violence, lawlessness and unrest in minority communities throughout the U.S. If allowed to continue, that agitation could devolve into anarchy and civil war. The BLM crowd appears to be spoiling for just such an outcome.

Nevertheless, BLM appears to be exercising considerable leverage over the Democratic Party, in part by pressuring and intimidating Democratic candidates such as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders (VT) into embracing their cause. The movement could also assist President Obama's exploitation of racial divisions in society beyond his final term in office.

This is an excellent article. It is a must read.

Most media coverage of BLM is simply lies. Most people who talk about BLM have no idea what the organization really is.

The BLM talking points are now parroted by the MSM and politicians. They say that police are the problem, not criminals. In fact, thousands of times more people in the U.S. are killed by blacks than by police officers. Those killed by blacks are mostly innocent citizens who do nothing wrong. Those few killed by police officers are criminals who prey on others.

Thank you, this is an excellent summation with the thesis paragraph at the very end:

“White” does not mean white. “White” in radical construction means anyone of any race, creed, nationality, color, sex, or sexual preference who embraces capitalism, free markets, limited government and American traditional culture and values. By definition, these beliefs are irredeemably evil and anyone who aligns with them is “white” in spirit and thus equally guilty of “white crimes.”

The Black Lives Matter movement carries this narrative to unprecedented heights, claiming that only whites can be racists. And while justifying violence to achieve “social justice,” the movement’s goal is to overthrow our society to replace it with a Marxist one. Many members of the black community would be shocked to learn that the intellectual godfathers of this movement are mostly white Communists, “queers” and leftist Democrats, intent on making blacks into cannon fodder for the revolution.

This should be important to every voter because Demonrat candidates O’Malley, Clinton, and Sanders have prostrated themselves before this ultra-subversive movement. Sanders allowed his mike to be grabbed from him and stood aside; Clinton granted a private audience; much like a Popess, and O’Malley apologized and groveled for suggesting that all lives might matter.

This is an excellent article. It is a must read.

I agree completely.

Unfortunately, I don't think "ordinary Blacks" would give a fig that this movement was created by white Communists and homosexuals. The people who were once rejected outright by Daniel DeLeon as so loyal to the Republican party there was no need even appealing to them, the people once used as the caricature of Biblical fundamentalist piety, have totally sold their souls. If they were ever going to change their voting or political behavior they would have done so long before now. They have been turned from one of the very oldest and most traditionalist of all American population groups into unthinking automatons--indeed, iconic demigods--for the Left.

With only a tiny exception all Black ministers and local politicians--even the most Southern and rural--are "all in" for all the Left's goals on all issues whatsoever, including those that have nothing whatsoever to do with race and poverty.

I once knew a beautiful, sweet Black chrstian girl in college. The last I heard from her, she had rejected religion and was part of the "Working Families Party."

I still wonder how the Left is going to get its "revolution" without guns (which they seem to want entirely in the hands of the state they are trying to "overthrow").

Also, as an interesting aside, I was reading about libertarianism in Wikipedia today and read a footnote from some "anarchist" who says that "anarcho-capitalists" can't be actual anarchists because they don't want a state. Yes, he actually said that!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.