Be honest, nothing Cruz produces will be sufficient for you.
Anita Trump needs to start acting more like a serious candidate and stop trying to keep his face on the cover of the National Enquirer.
...Be honest, nothing Cruz produces will be sufficient for you...
Zero waited years to come up with a ‘birth certificate.’
But, it looked like a fake. This diversion has become very effective for Trump. I like Cruz. I like Trump. This is a cagey political move.
“Anita Trump needs to start acting more like a serious candidate and stop trying to keep his face on the cover of the National Enquirer.”
“Anita”?
“serious candidate”?
That you, Jeb!?
Be honest, nothing Cruz produces will be sufficient for you.
Anita Trump needs to start acting more like a serious candidate and stop trying to keep his face on the cover of the National Enquirer.”
Well you can sit and b!tch about people on FR bringing it up, and think that simple shaming is sufficient to brush it off.
But the thing you guys need to be asking yourself is if these guys are bringing this up, how much of it is already loaded up by the Democrats, and ready to fire? Or having control of the executive branch, how much MORE may they have.
It isn’t logical to have had most people on FR knocking Obama for 8 years over this same issue, but then you demand that a similar issue with Cruz be swept under the rug because it’s inconvenient.
If Cruz were ever to be the nominee or even VP, this is going to be an issue, and it will be pushed by the left and the media, and they aren’t going to care what people on FR, or 10,000 conservative bloggers (that think an opinion piece is as good as a court ruling) think about it.
Ted Cruz flip flop compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftY8UjxeqTk
As valid as the stuff I see posted about Trump.
I won’t hesitate to vote for Cruz if he is the nominee.
“Be honest, nothing Cruz produces will be sufficient for you.”
I’d be satisfied to see his Canadian birth certificate.
Why’s he hiding it?
It’s worse than that. Probably a trick question. Natural born citizenship devolves by birth, automatically. Documentation is a formality, which can be supplemented by other data sources. Whereas some here have mentioned the document in question as evidence of naturalization, so producing it would only reinforce that the birth was statutorily controlled, therefore not “natural born.” This of course would be error, because the birth could be documented that way and still be qualified as “natural” for constitutional purposes, which probably makes this whole exercise nothing but an elaborate red herring designed to keep a bogus controversy alive for at least the next few weeks. IMHO.
Peace,
SR
I wouldn’t worry about Anita Trump, he is just sounding the alarm to what the Democrats have in store for Cruz.
I’d worry about Rinse Dickless, the head of the RINO RNC who won’t even back Cruz on his NBC Status..