Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
The founders obviously rejected the English means of government as embraced the thoughts of enlightened thinkers like John Locke and Emer de Vattel. The fact that the constitution even and that we do not live under a monarchy indicates to me that I am correct. Ergo I do not believe the founders adopted the English definition of NBS but rather adopted Vattels'

there is a good discussion here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3381836/posts?q=1&;page=101

Well off to do a little work, bye for now.

69 posted on 01/10/2016 9:16:39 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: jpsb

“Ergo I do not believe the founders adopted the English definition of NBS but rather adopted Vattels’ “

Except Vattel never wrote about NBC. He didn’t in French, and the English translations prior to 1797 used “natives, or indigenes”...and the Constitution doesn’t say the President must be a native citizen, or an indigenous citizen.

Besides - they used NBC and NBS interchangeably before and after the US Constitution was written, which is hard to explain if they didn’t believe they were interchangeable ideas.


75 posted on 01/10/2016 9:33:00 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson