[DoughtyOne]

I’m glad to hear that none of you Cruz supporters use anything that was built or created using eminent domain.

I think that is a great moral stand and I respect it.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

Trump wanted to build a limo parking lot.

[Yosemitest]

You left out the real DIFFERENCE between Trump and others:

Trump uses "EMINENT DOMAIN"

FOR PRIVATE USE !

That's a humongous difference !

[mbrfl]

Cruz’s, ahem.. evolving position on birthright citizenship.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zBW8vLnRDY

[House Atreides]

I’m glad to hear that none of you Cruz supporters use anything that was built or created using eminent domain.

I think that is a great moral stand and I respect it.
*********************************************************************************
Oh, we “Cruz supporters” are firm believers that eminent domain has a place in our great nation. In our view, eminent domain is rightly employed when needed to build agreed upon PUBLIC projects such as bridges, interstate highway systems, public airports, etc. And, of course, the use of eminent domain is proper ONLY when just and fair compensation is given to the people whose property is being appropriated through legal process.

We “Cruz supporters” do NOT believe that one person’s property should be INVOLUNTARILY taken and ownership transferred to another PRIVATE ENTITY for that ENTITIES USE. Such CRONYISM and abuse/corruption of governmental power is greatly despised by constitutionalists such as “Cruz supporters”.

[libbylu]

... I’m glad to hear that none of you Cruz supporters use anything that was built or created using eminent domain.

I think that is a great moral stand and I respect it.

I respect your right to believe that eminent domain was NOT used by DT to simply screw others and make money though clearly it was. Not the same as government taking to build roads.

[CA Conservative]

I'm glad to hear that none of you Cruz supporters use anything that was built or created using eminent domain.

So you are in favor of using eminent domain to take property from one private citizen and give it to another private citizen or company, not for public use but so the 2nd party (usually a crony capitalist like Trump) can make more money??? Gee, I remember when the Kelo decision came out, conservatives were outraged. I guess since it is Trump who benefits from it, now the Kelo decision is on the side of the angels...