Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: afraidfortherepublic
Citing the heavy burden of screening so many emails in a short period of time, the agency also announced on Thursday it would not include subject lines or information about senders and recipients with the records. The omissions made the emails more difficult to search.

The fact that the omissions make them more difficult to search is why they were omitted, duh. If the premise of time constraints was accurate, they could promise to re-release them without the omissions.

This is the same tactic of making produced documents less useful that Hillary carried out when she delivered hers in completely unsearchable form, although to a lesser degree.

4 posted on 01/08/2016 10:09:21 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Why does the msm not approach these emails with the same resources and fervor that they employed for analyzing Sarah Palins emails, which If I remember correctly were not dumped because of an actual criminal investigation?


23 posted on 01/08/2016 10:44:15 AM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson